[netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13

Aanchal Malhotra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 April 2019 21:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aanchal Malhotra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: netconf@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Aanchal Malhotra <aanchal4@bu.edu>
Message-ID: <155501965074.14152.2835369201856309773@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:54:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/uXFVffeDg6uKc7XCZMIldHHGt-A>
Subject: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13

Reviewer: Aanchal Malhotra
Review result: Ready

The document is very clear and concise.  I just have one minor clarification question.
Section 3.4 Page 9 that says the following:
"In addition to any required ........SHOULD only be allowed......".  

Is there a reason for using SHOULD instead of MUST?

[netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-n… Aanchal Malhotra via Datatracker
Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ie… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ie… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ie… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)