IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF

Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Wed, 04 July 2018 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606E4130DDF for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqGg4nCi7cZW for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02176130DD7 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 69AF574864A70 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 07:01:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.39) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 07:01:14 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.6]) by DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::b177:a243:7a69:5ab8%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:01:03 +0800
From: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "Zhengguangying (Walker)" <zhengguangying@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF
Thread-Index: AdQTOvQ+DGsUYeJXQ/uaFzBxunpGvAABkhagAAO3KjAAAum+QA==
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 06:01:02 +0000
Message-ID: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBC90C8@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEC24AC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBC8F99@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEC379E@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEC379E@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.150.121]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBC90C8dggeml510mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/uXwPtti9Tm8rZfA4m7NByA_xOYE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 06:01:22 -0000



[Qin]:Yes, invoking action on configuration datastore is our key use cases,e.g., batch operation on 100 interfaces and enable Interface statistics and
Then set MTU value to a specific interface. Enable interface statistics on 100 interfaces will happen first and then MTU value setup.
These operations have no conflict risk and can execute in any order in one transaction, it will be great to introduce this multi-sub operations in one transaction.
[Rohit R Ranade] But why must this happen in single transaction ? If done as two separate RPC what is the impact ?

In Some other cases when action is invoked in operational state datastore, we can use <operational> to get learned configuration and translate them into static configuration.
[Rohit R Ranade] We can still do this. We can get learned configuration from <operational>, and if need to translate to static we can always create such configuration in <running>

With Regards,
Rohit R Ranade

From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: 04 July 2018 07:32
To: netconf@ietf.org<mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: [Netconf] Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF

Hi, Folks:
We have posted inline action capability draft on Jun 28:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg14823.html



One comment we received from the list is:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg14863.html

The v-(01) is uploaded to address this comment.
Therefore we would like to draw you attention again on this draft

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-netconf-inline-action-capability-01
We would like to receive more review and feedback on this draft, thanks.

-Qin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email