Re: [Netconf] WGLC on restconf-notif-08

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBB912D4F2 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VWkIwXPvUI7W for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E714130DD0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.60]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 034AD1AE0365; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:58:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:58:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20181025.085820.439553379534542406.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: kwatsen@juniper.net
Cc: rrahman@cisco.com, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <A19424BA-7F59-4B5B-96EB-635AFB217309@juniper.net>
References: <20181011.122820.1889985185460521508.mbj@tail-f.com> <B37A6FEA-1E8A-4A3C-9B92-33EAF38E69C3@cisco.com> <A19424BA-7F59-4B5B-96EB-635AFB217309@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/unLDWiRF0TOy8mti1ow_KIYcaGY>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC on restconf-notif-08
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 06:58:24 -0000

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> > Since this is an existing issue (not caused by the -notif drafts),
> > if the outcome is slow can we just remove this example to be able
> > to advance those docs?
> 
> It appears that the outcome is slow.  Any objection to removing the
> example so the Last Call can close?

Yes, I object to that.  I think we need to address the issue, rather
than pretending it isn't an issue.  If we can't figure out what an
example looks like, how is an implementor supposed to get this right?

IMO SN should adopt the solution proposed by Juergen, and the example
updated.


/martin