[netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04

Dear WG,

This adoption call was unsuccessful.

There is obviously a lot of interest, but the solution doesn’t seem adequate, given the comments made on the list.  Not to disparage the effort, but the problem is rather intractable!

Andy mentioned that an Interim may be needed, which seems right (+1 if you agree), but I wonder if there isn’t more that can be done in preparation first.  Specifically, as this effort challenges fundamentals, it would help to clarify the motivation and expected outcomes.

One high-level question I have, is there anything wrong with the “notification” statement in RFC 7950?  That is, is this at all a YANG-next issue for the NETMOD WG, or is to purely NETCONF WG issue?

Kent

> On Apr 6, 2024, at 6:14 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> NETCONF WG,
> 
> This message starts a two week poll on adopting the following document:
> 
> 	YANG model for NETCONF Event Notifications
> 	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ahuang-netconf-notif-yang-04
> 
> The poll ends April 20.
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> No IPR is known for this document:  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/oQVZ6Pf_novNfMB4RsnDxQibHpM/
> 
> PS: this document received strong support before, being very focused, providing just a module enabling validation of YANG “notification” messages.
> 
> Kent and Per (as co-chairs)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf