Re: [netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6368)

Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Tue, 19 January 2021 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A103A16F5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:22:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J9tkfxB2H6LW for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0762B3A16F1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504D638B35E; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:22:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZv47571DHqv; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.68.121] (pool-173-48-33-241.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.33.241]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B520638B35B; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:22:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100017696493c92-1a3c9143-3975-444f-b0f6-c12c39a58ef7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:22:47 -0500
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com>, "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C4D4664-0282-42E8-AF2E-33D15AF9904B@amsl.com>
References: <8A1D1573-6DBB-4767-9C4C-944AFD6D3058.ref@yahoo.com> <8A1D1573-6DBB-4767-9C4C-944AFD6D3058@yahoo.com> <0100017696493c92-1a3c9143-3975-444f-b0f6-c12c39a58ef7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/vWVWGLPJ8JvYnpx7cxbW1whUX7A>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6368)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 19:22:53 -0000

Greetings,

FYI - errata report EID 6368 has been deleted as it seems to have been replaced by https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6369.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

On Dec 24, 2020, at 2:45 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:

> Let it be noted that this Errata (6368) is rejected.
> 
> Muly, please submit another Errata with the solution forwarded by Eric.
> 
> Kent // as co-Chair
> 
> 
>> On Dec 24, 2020, at 1:55 PM, Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1. 
>> 
>> On 2020-12-24, 1:27 PM, "netconf on behalf of Eric Voit (evoit)" <netconf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>>    Yes, that is what I suggest: that we change '22' to '39' in the URI.
>> 
>>    Eric
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2020 11:23 AM
>>> To: Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>
>>> Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>rg>; Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
>>> <rrahman@cisco.com>om>; Einar Nilsen-Nygaard (einarnn) <einarnn@cisco.com>om>;
>>> ludwig@clemm.org; andy@yumaworks.com; warren@kumari.net; Rob Wilton
>>> (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>om>; Mahesh Jethanandani
>>> <mjethanandani@gmail.com>om>; muly_i@rad.com; netconf@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6368)
>>> 
>>> Hi Eric,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for you comment.  But note that the errata system is binary,
>>    either an
>>> errata is accepted or rejected.  To do what you say entails rejecting this
>>    errata
>>> and submitting a different one to say it,  Is this what you advocate?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kent
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 24, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Rather than changing the subscription from 22 to 39, the URI should be
>>    made:
>>>> https://example.com/restconf/subscriptions/39
>>>> 
>>>> Reasons:
>>>> (1) There is no assumption that the subscription is the same one as
>>>> for the previous example.
>>>> (2) We want to keep the examples in lock-step with RFC8640.
>>>> 
>>>> Eric
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    netconf mailing list
>>    netconf@ietf.org
>>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>> 
>> 
>