IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Netconf] WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Thu, 25 September 2008 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <netconf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500C53A689D; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AB83A689B for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQh0PzccWF6A for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F903A689D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8P9i9AD014425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:44:09 +0200
Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8P9i9Ia011337; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:44:09 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.17]) by demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:44:09 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:44:07 +0200
Message-ID: <A294F5A3E722D94FBEB6D49C1506F6F7EA6155@DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt
Thread-Index: AckeeL7BWp0YU3CbRtCCShffwHu2ggAcu8TA
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: netconf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2008 09:44:09.0234 (UTC) FILETIME=[42246F20:01C91EF3]
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Checked for Spam by eleven - eXpurgate www.eXpurgate.net
X-purgate-ID: 151667::080925114409-322EABB0-AA21AFD6/0-0/0-15
X-purgate-size: 1081/0
Subject: [Netconf] WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org

> Hi All, 
> as discussed in the NETCONF session Badra initiated 
> the review of the security AD Pasi and updated the 
> draft NETCONF over TLS based on the recommendations 
> in the session and Pasi's review comments (see 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04 and
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg03743.html). 
> With this mail we want to start a WGLC for the draft 
> NETCONF over TLS, which is proposed to publish as a 
> Proposed Standard RFC. 
> 
> The WGLC starts on September 25, 2008 and will run 
> until October 10, 2008. 
> Unfortunately there were no additional comments on 
> the last version of the draft on the maillist. 
> We definitely want to be sure whether we have sufficient 
> WG support for the document or not. 
> 
> PLEASE REVIEW and comment it. Even if you don't have 
any technical comments PLEASE SPEAK UP AND STATE 
whether you support it or not!
> Thank you and looking forward for your reviews and 
> comments. 
> 
> Mehmet & Bert
> 
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email