Re: [netconf] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-22

"Alexander Clemm" <> Wed, 24 April 2019 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792FA1200F6; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSaianuPf5FD; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6759712009E; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LAPTOPR7T053C2 ([]) by (mreueus003 []) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MThzC-1hAaU618YC-00QQcI; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:44:26 +0200
From: "Alexander Clemm" <>
To: "'Wesley Eddy'" <>, <>
Cc: <>, <>, <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:44:24 -0700
Message-ID: <105601d4fac5$5cb31ad0$16195070$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQImeKsXAsmkEFCYMkbOhl/9oS8J9KWomQZA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:V3++lmidUmnHkqGdmO5gsEifeDcrESRdY4conS0jeRpQywxLS0m oMjUNtI7QrXK42czkIa02xKVvCU/YWy+QJPS2iwxuAqQp3/4t61z5kJynPhDc6+0Y0H2se0 i5Jf2xqk/pHAA03Y1JjhL70hixLNq77JhNGiV9nl3iGR2ODPKd0WM1Xv3nUinRBdQP5vXjG 6dUk7EhqsVMMRxJIloSRw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:hc4I2FLYGY4=:WGAKddhanHs39Btx4zs/Ih N+oFg2s9HvdLiuuP07Z5ISFmQclu/rMB3aISrL2g3ydmY3KMFBpjGPgjBbcBce7Z+mhXve7yi qd5NYrMSoQ6e1KUeVhJTIorHVSik9WYYM8I/yg3kYf2md/iQff+/jEH/VtvHwI+gnqFBazT+n 2Kotg9zWMYiCPWYUUIcRs/8+flogBhOJt/E3iNTTnWFso967ytXyjfunopAKwgZd/U9eIID9J kkInGTOFhRtXfQabz5orv78VPCwCz9jNLRcKMxp4UPM+ie2whvzI+yPsckDgn4eCfFPX7uQCh aL+smTIQQdg/qxeSkcQIERzeFQkEzeWYF/vHq2D2umcKCR4iHSYwRHfIdnyfWgNUjqZ/0Npwp EWmlmU/HWKEeTrSccMMcl1X1B+r0MHAs0AQFh4oF0tPnTRRZwgIYaRoShOozSI9iqGVNvSGhP DqGW2gzddJQQwZ1pqajNfjIHm4dYtB8QINweViPADPRA+FGYZASKL9mUlsHckCYr85yNi+s+Q swVwxWnuaJM7fKYNugp+d0QzZh7jpRQiXI/co18hGKW7n9OjTMgffrZbaMa936A4uJ8qq0IGV NcwWzD5jZDdHiAXkUmEcG5E3oUhcVMROzF4md28FKWnB0km5/iWWa2IeJ3/IHJU2A0wt+QHGo +9OhQpi4KjNmAzxWwK7VeX+iPTPFrWJqjoJKzkDzfsZde42P5u75XMhvuPIce6K1AcgiwibTU 45ovJeeXEsR6lToO5B7I5GVKDNFTFDHMYShRb5dOc7NNlPB6Od2XeTvYI+E=
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-22
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:44:34 -0000

Hi Wesley, thank you for your review!
--- Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: netconf <>; On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy via
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:23 AM
Subject: [netconf] Tsvart last call review of

Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the
IETF discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC if you reply to or forward this review.

I reviewed this in conjunction with the set of related WG documents on
NETCONF/RESTCONF subscriptions and event notifications.  On this specific
document, I didn't find any issues, though I do have comments that will be
send on other documents in the set, some of which may influence this once,
since they are closely related.

netconf mailing list