Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (5858)
Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> Thu, 17 October 2019 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <ibagdona@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E081120B93 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qju6jBgCgatz for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF6D120B90 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b20so3628386ljj.5 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HlRaR7PTAUqtXqw1cJSQuIUhpqAoDZ9GI1lLdZa3KFs=; b=co3htEe6XacRmp/FybGBaNkwi+TUQop+slaD1SE1HiUCU2P89hdAA0LNEIQtaFeW5u UbPa9ied+Br2/AFkZMTkbkQ8JTK0+zorm59uLcQYAW4YkkDj0ev3B5skDHdUHM6zoZ73 DEef+Y04kFgdb6UaQ1p++hRXjyiRn/nJZN3mv2g2p7Cx5xScpINoRjvmOUg/KiuSfKVM y/t6kzjwPsDEoNPAjlFL/PnvyJgGZhgRXCEXAkym0cKDiJyDVqwoirDfrCyJI3IMM0up xtq0vh4JRdb6YQAZDZPgrwjKJMW9631Tmohajh2KiZqF3VonK4HsVCERJHntX86EpW5E z1qg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HlRaR7PTAUqtXqw1cJSQuIUhpqAoDZ9GI1lLdZa3KFs=; b=s+rWOrIFau6GpvJs5Hd61baLvw5VMBWlNOmHrjXMMlkBa/62GLbrC/1kOMEeb8TRfW anPWKJWr4X+XVVinC4SVxW4YdGt5wXi1gE63EMju5Hx7Nx8iLtZ8dnjb3fDak22bF9Bh B+4TWWyUvJJx2V8zTVFHFO+WzJ4DhqFfQwbBGpThd5qMp156GN2v4ClpVuyMiXv96s01 GV3mOLc4LP2RI74B+y1i45RNj8uXacHfvJp7GMw/vkIvQBF7Y8dTgpTPgWQxyLU7IxeJ rlIM9XzpGgJlXZsI6zEyFUG3LsvN/3Yx/M8igQV+tbFPkkb8ZAkk7J5PC1rgqxoMgV7s RMWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxu7TbFSrBHch3n80pJafU3/mIkQ1RuXovyID1mkASsYPllKME luVJCGHdJQ0kEi9ZbV2xpihPTOEr7rD/4HR6804=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyWty3zyjIh3OwKFizwxaHpj5Cmj3w42GiSpWkxdoXnqDNhgyY5YCC4QTigTEVOH+dWh4sKK11k2KuA56/J0Ho=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9981:: with SMTP id w1mr3410527lji.205.1571337651915; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190911040238.4CD72B81289@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190911040238.4CD72B81289@rfc-editor.org>
From: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 19:40:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CABwpohsL57xdta3tLd2WpYy841zowHeFyb6wBnH8SmrvXh90Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, netconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009097fd05951f8eb9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/xhQYTj656bbIlencfb_FvC9KowM>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (5858)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 18:40:58 -0000
This appears to be factually incorrect - there examples in sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 do not refer to ietf-interfaces, instead they use an example module defined in RFC 6243 section A.1. The prefix therefore should be example: instead. On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:02 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040, > "RESTCONF Protocol". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5858 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Qin WU <bill.wu@huawei.com> > > Section: 5.3.1,5.3.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > GET /restconf/data/interfaces/interface=eth1 > ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1 > Host: example.com > Accept: application/yang-data+xml > > GET /restconf/data/interfaces/interface=eth1\ > ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1 > Host: example.com > Accept: application/yang-data+json > > Corrected Text > -------------- > GET /restconf/data/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/interface=eth1 > ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1 > Host: example.com > Accept: application/yang-data+xml > > GET /restconf/data/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/interface=eth1\ > ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1 > Host: example.com > Accept: application/yang-data+json > > Notes > ----- > Based on the rule defined in section 3.5.3 of RFC8040, the module name > ietf-interface followed by a colon character (":") should be prepended to > the node name interfaces. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18) > -------------------------------------- > Title : RESTCONF Protocol > Publication Date : January 2017 > Author(s) : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Configuration > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (58… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Ignas Bagdonas