Re: [netconf] Query regarding rfc6241 - 7.2
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 15 January 2020 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A0C1200A3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:01:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ev2VL5z4txF2 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1139212006D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.41]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76FF51AE0351; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:01:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:00:46 +0100
Message-Id: <20200115.130046.2182524722233687962.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: arunapotti@gmail.com
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACpTNnahb=o6PHqqzbdYi+QcN56HQBJNzBk+VqY8xGfC5ScpcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACpTNnahb=o6PHqqzbdYi+QcN56HQBJNzBk+VqY8xGfC5ScpcA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 25.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/yUc5CVhwJUPKoFFw15EwMS1jOiY>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Query regarding rfc6241 - 7.2
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:01:35 -0000
Hi, It seems you are setting the administrative-state to 'outOfService' on a set of interfaces, and at the same time you delete these interfaces. So instead you should simply just delete them. Alternatively, fist send one edit-config that sets the administrative-state, and then a second edit-config with the deletes. /martin aruna potti <arunapotti@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question in section 7.2 of rfc6241. > > If the <edit-config> operation contains multiple sub-operations > that apply to the same conceptual node in the underlying data > model, then the result of the operation is undefined (i.e., > outside the scope of the NETCONF protocol). > > As per the description I would like understand if my below query > response is defined or not. > > If my request is not valid, please suggest how we can break it into > multiple valid edit-configs? > > > <nc:rpc > xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" > nc:message-id="FJ0883"> > > <nc:edit-config> > <nc:target> > <nc:running/> </nc:target> > <nc:config> > <org-openroadm-device xmlns="http://org/openroadm/device"> > <interface> > <name>odu-1-11-42/1.1.1</name> > <type > xmlns:openROADM-if="http://org/openroadm/interfaces">openROADM-if:otnOdu</type> > > <administrative-state>outOfService</administrative-state> > <odu xmlns="http://org/openroadm/otn-odu-interfaces"/> > </interface> > <interface> > <name>odu-1-11-2/1</name> > <type > xmlns:openROADM-if="http://org/openroadm/interfaces">openROADM-if:otnOdu</type> > > <administrative-state>outOfService</administrative-state> > <odu xmlns="http://org/openroadm/otn-odu-interfaces"/> > </interface> > <interface> > <name>eth-1-11-2/1</name> > <type > xmlns:openROADM-if="http://org/openroadm/interfaces">openROADM-if:ethernetCsmacd</type> > > <administrative-state>outOfService</administrative-state> > </interface> > <interface nc:operation="delete"> > <name>odu-1-11-42/1.1.1</name> > <type > xmlns:openROADM-if="http://org/openroadm/interfaces">openROADM-if:otnOdu</type> > > </interface> > <interface nc:operation="delete"> > <name>odu-1-11-2/1</name> > <type > xmlns:openROADM-if="http://org/openroadm/interfaces">openROADM-if:otnOdu</type> > > </interface> > <interface nc:operation="delete"> > <name>eth-1-11-2/1</name> > <type > xmlns:openROADM-if="http://org/openroadm/interfaces">openROADM-if:ethernetCsmacd</type> > > </interface> > <odu-connection nc:operation="delete"> > <connection-name>odu-1-11-42_1.1.1_odu-1-11-2_1</connection-name> > </odu-connection> > </org-openroadm-device> > </nc:config> > </nc:edit-config> > </nc:rpc> > > > Thanks, > > Aruna.
- [netconf] Query regarding rfc6241 - 7.2 aruna potti
- Re: [netconf] Query regarding rfc6241 - 7.2 Martin Bjorklund