IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (6277)

Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se> Thu, 03 September 2020 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9023A0B2D for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PDS_NAKED_TO_NUMERO=1.482, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=4668.se header.b=ZM4n/82S; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=WgY8yog9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOVG1qm4lwx8 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759CD3A0ADD for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B025C01C5; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:59:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:59:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=4668.se; h=date :message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh= m/kVpp5Rd57fi13ZVMZnj4WcspHDkpGEKV4DTj8aUnk=; b=ZM4n/82SM/wmBn3b 7EwLwvSeTh0En5LUFYvR7Dj5UO4V2ECWa44JD3mWtihkKzQtFpKDlpMqis0CAyu6 DtoJ0tgE3V3k8NukT2rzgAhKtXObAcGGlOtKTy3hFVnQGY//hSTpu+8w3LtfdmX2 5r8sWA3pPvYwh/gzF3Aj1Y1LDnr8v4YDOLASHSGrEwce+9aK6LdAz8TFfssrxk78 HgpSAdr3F/NpYtrMaVGCSh468icxuiNLurLQAG5LmJr60lBKlvbsm/ww5VRmRVeI T/C3ht+ukEKhJ4w0H2kay3jYL+KIqiETN6SzgfRyjV90YuRby9spt72TQBu7E2nK XROP+A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=m/kVpp5Rd57fi13ZVMZnj4WcspHDkpGEKV4DTj8aU nk=; b=WgY8yog9skS0FxO1IIhIJTHxDdzMHjMPX/M450Rkx5wcrzEkAl7f6l0my bV3KU7XswinAK2QAr3CWmO1xXCW0KCFBdMloPxJ5cBHIMEQ/s8lnuyj+bNGcJomV ImC4AQWMgkfKanjBH6TJMtaSXKT4U9JuIfLxX7ms/hhxmf7oG0P6od4lr9ef4N6/ M1C5wVcU4+nJ6xOgtArXwPI1wi7XxMiFdVwzWke7kan0bh/H2x8INWbIsKIdYOVi /edWWHvk96O8Qc/ypb5QwbKLG3MvGZmyRrlzAKqdE+AIcpbf+oa15Aqyng6hRLPf snyIWO6ZxtINbHMR3r4oQHxwfvU2w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:uehQXxxWU86xkX6TRcOn_JSQqpe1X5sxGaNIyNfh8b3PQS4ozvM80Q> <xme:uehQXxTunqp1Qs9qb26Oo1SouLv_NeG2jjzCa1NVrcg-vI8h0yecdN8NWlgypk9MM Fro2aoTxBXEZ9gE_0I>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeguddgiedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffkffvuffhjghfofggtgfgsehtsg ertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrthhinhcuuehjnphrkhhluhhnugcuoehmsghjodhi vghtfhesgeeiieekrdhsvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfedvhefgieevteehleekke dvgfdthfduveffffelleeigefgvddvgfffledvveeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehrfhgtqdgv ughithhorhdrohhrghdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedvuddvrddvudegrdduuddrie dtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgs jhdoihgvthhfseegieeikedrshgv
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:uehQX7WuYTnZG_MTsl2blA795dfWmGvhW5k1mJPHKhzjZMxQQdfxLQ> <xmx:uehQXzhtTXuJmkXE-4AoFCcDfInqzLeTFsXvsF0sQdonJ6vN_Utptg> <xmx:uehQXzCV-4vn0d5E6jdhNoNyuiTLu5TMMqwFewFMG0wQvUVQMhxMAA> <xmx:uehQX-7YZqBw_2e9Pusg3Qu4INxJYeCSlTFDfY0IWjLzSupF_PCb9w>
Received: from localhost (212-214-11-60-static.se.customer.tele2.net [212.214.11.60]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1936C3060057; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:59:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:59:33 +0200
Message-Id: <20200903.145933.1392342869737444306.id@4668.se>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: andy@yumaworks.com, mbj+ietf@4668.se, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
In-Reply-To: <20200903121643.423ADF40786@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20200903121643.423ADF40786@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/ygxOvOVEFzkpWZUY7RVmw46k1v8>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (6277)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:59:40 -0000

Hi,

This errata is correct (it is the result of a discussion on the
netconf ML re errata 6271).


/martin


RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040,
> "RESTCONF Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6277
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> 
> Section: 4.8.5
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The default value is "last".
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The default value is “last”, except when used with PUT 
> and the target resource already exists, in which case the 
> default is to replace the target resource without altering
> its position in the "ordered-by user” list or leaf-list.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "last" default is intended for when creating a new element.  
> 
> A PUT operation that replaces a list or leaf-list entry should not move the entry unless the "insert" parameter is explicitly passed.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RESTCONF Protocol
> Publication Date    : January 2017
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email