Re: [netconf] Question on draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 06 April 2020 16:49 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE93A3A0B33 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-g4J5r_QqOb for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8864D3A0AE5 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id BC3CAF2C969D1BF3D7E9 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:42:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:42:45 +0100
Received: from DGGEML511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.195]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:42:40 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] Question on draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications
Thread-Index: AQHWDDJiiNAk45aEUUGkJOakomgnJA==
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:42:39 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAAD5C8D91@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <DC9F3836-43E6-48AD-A0BC-7381892200B8@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DC9F3836-43E6-48AD-A0BC-7381892200B8@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAAD5C8D91dggeml511mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/zZ_6L6K0ArClSnSFqsEzhhWxnEw>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Question on draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:49:43 -0000
The big motivation of this draft is to instruct which of subscription can be bundled together into a single transport Message since when the server bundles subscriptions together, he needs to understand which subscription needs to bundle together, based on which subscription classification criteria. 发件人： Reshad Rahman (rrahman)<rrahman=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rrahman=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> 收件人： netconf<netconf@ietf.org<mailto:netconf@ietf.org>> 主题： [netconf] Question on draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications 时间： 2020-04-07 00:10:40 Hi, I just went through the draft (very) quickly. I don’t understand the need to bundle multiple existing subscriptions together. Why not have 1 subscription to multiple nodes using union in XPath? Regards, Reshad.
- [netconf] Question on draft-wang-netconf-bulk-sub… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netconf] Question on draft-wang-netconf-bulk… Qin Wu