Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option

Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp> Thu, 11 August 2011 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C00411E809C for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26n5pgd8XCII for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1414211E80A9 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B1517481F2 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:58:31 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sycLOhbOKU2Q for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:58:30 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.145]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E957D174813D for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:58:30 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (Mugi.mn.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.29]) by ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BD21B9AC for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:56:46 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4E445E94.7090800@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:58:28 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: netext@ietf.org
References: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:57:56 -0000

Hi Raj,

I support this I-D:

(2011/08/11 6:51), Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
> 1. Is the solution to offloading specific IPv4 flows from a MAG of
> interest to the WG?
> 
> Yes   [X]
> No    [ ]
> 
> 2. Should we adopt as WG I-D:
> draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt which will serve as
> the starting point in specifying the solution?
> 
> Yes  [X]
> No   [ ]

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi