[Netext] next steps for netext

Hello,

I think that at this point a pragmatic approach would probably help in solving some of the controversial issues.
IETF specified 5213 and as such should also specify how hosts are supposed to behave in a PMIPv6 domain.
This should include:
- MN to MAG interface: we had, for instance, such a document in Netlmm. It seems that L2 and L3 solutions are being discussed again, we need to document them in an Informational document
- Multihoming in PMIPv6: it seems clear there are attractive scenarios people are willing to explore. Again let's capture all of this in an informational document.

Comments?

telemaco

-----Message d'origine-----
De : netext-bounces at mail.mobileip.jp [mailto:netext-bounces at mail.mobileip.jp] De la part de Jari Arkko
Envoy? : lundi 6 avril 2009 19:03
? : Vijay Devarapalli
Cc : netext at mail.mobileip.jp
Objet : Re: [Netext] next steps for netext

Vijay ,

> There was quite a bit of confusion on the "host changes" at the BoF. I 
> hope we are not taking decisions based on this confusion. That would 
> be very disappointing.
>   

We are not making any decisions yet about the confused or controversial parts. I sent out the charter so that we can at least move forward with the rest. I'd be interested in hearing ideas on how to move forward with the inter-access and multihoming parts.

Jari

_______________________________________________
NetExt mailing list
NetExt at mail.mobileip.jp
http://www.mobileip.jp/mailman/listinfo/netext