IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4768E21F8648 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elFmxWIy+StX for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C65F21F85C9 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh104.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.30]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q6DC8pA5027086; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:08:52 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.21]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:09:18 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-071.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.164]) by 008-AM1MMR1-012.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.21]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.004; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:08:50 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com, netext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
Thread-Index: AQHNYNk4gAMYTdsgxkWSuCD0y/Yk0JcmqX0A
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:08:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CC25799B.2107A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FFFE91F.8030006@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420
x-originating-ip: [72.64.105.77]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <DBAFCC8F45D21340932C349749C703CB@mgd.nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2012 12:09:18.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[545F6D50:01CD60F0]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:08:21 -0000

Alex,

I don¹t know where you have come across statements about PMIP-NEMO being
impossible. Its just FUD.
DHCP is an independent protocol and hence has no implications regarding
network based mobility teams design of not modifying the MN.

-Raj

On 7/13/12 4:23 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu"
<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>NETEXT WG members,
>
>It was said at times that PMIP-NEMO is impossible.  PMIP is a core
>network protocol, where mobility is supported without modifying the MN.
>
>Or, in some PMIP-NEMO proposals, the MN _is_ modified: for example it
>adds DHCP Client on it; or other times it performs HNP Division.
>
>BEcause of this there exist statements that PMIP-NEMO is impossible.
>
>Do you think there are other reasons why PMIP-NEMO is impossible?
>
>Do you think that running DHCP Client on MN is a modification to MN?
>
>Alex
>
>_______________________________________________
>netext mailing list
>netext@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status