[netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Wed, 10 August 2011 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEF611E8084 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1U3Hv4TFUJz8 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81F011E807D for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh104.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.30]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p7ALYjd4017995 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:35:21 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:34:45 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.59) by NOK-AM1MHUB-03.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:34:30 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-024.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.4.61]) by 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.59]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:34:30 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: netext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
Thread-Index: AQHMV6VIS+vHAvnEiUyuG4wvA5tZBw==
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:34:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.137]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <FF3590CA03D5CE47B11DEC47571624FF@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2011 21:34:45.0356 (UTC) FILETIME=[52941AC0:01CC57A5]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:34:50 -0000

At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for
Proxy Mobile IPv6" <draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt>

General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation
is a required feature for PMIP6. We gauged the interest in the room to
adopt this I-D as the starting point of a WG I-D for the PD feature
and observed the following:

"
Chairs: how many people think the problem is relevant: 19
How many have read it: 7
How many think that the proposed solution in the draft can be starting
point to work on the problem?
In favor: 7 ;  Opposed: 1
"

We are now following up with the questions on the ML.

Question to WG: 

1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?

Yes   [ ]
No    [ ]

2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
feature?

Yes   [ ]
No    [ ]

Please respond by August 18th on the ML.

-Chairs

Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt