[netext] Addition of text for IANA section of WiFi-EAP Attributes draft

Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354951A016F for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AM4DV68_wTBt for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8251F1A0100 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id bs8so5103668wib.9 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=X+S3bYnFJGSsZEtYD4K61ayGMUetrh7UscBAnT6rFkk=; b=rmTRKIm1PApx2On+/5a2RuUeLqiZoS2JYT0rQLbLqn2aSJ3or5DrVYy9jlgsB0HMQy ei1D4EkGG6/2uehP8viQrLc9LSYTrk4+dx1CnTFYeREVPN8YUniVbwJQO1ryhciV0K8O vne90xFZX1c+ForVgU6wcwcVOw/aaw9zyZCjSSo7Wxd6/2Oog9Lcf5IauXMeNNz+fv5/ F418lWBfIJnOMEEoZiuBOS8tvJL5RufS3rBlkO3b7NZvppVqyRAkWWMZA7CNv4HIxGDl I1DyeF7Mu37Lo7GQ/VYtH3YQOx2EVYXY70bpmUwZNmaPtw3GDppWLO9f8C5O8EO5g6ee DMEQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.6 with SMTP id h6mr32089151wiv.65.1410292794128; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.94.166 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:59:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAB_pk7CjoryWvLd0cpNrFiqcYDJUygjz8e77qxBBjp67XUYOdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c7f0405fe130502a7610a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/5fTSyjff5dW-CJb4tsgcgGMPtqo
Subject: [netext] Addition of text for IANA section of WiFi-EAP Attributes draft
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:59:57 -0000

Hello folks,

background: draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes specifies a new IANA
registry for EAP attributes, with a Specification Required clause. Jouni
and Pierrick have agreed to be the Designated Experts for future IANA
requests for assignments.

proposal: the following text is proposed for the IANA Designated Expert's
review of future requests for EAP attribute assignments from the
above-mentioned registry. This text is a guidance for IANA, and I am
including here for WG information.

"The Designated Expert should review the requirements for new assignments
based on factors including, but not limited to, the source of request
(e.g., standards bodies), deployment needs (e.g., industry consortium,
operator community) and experimental needs (e.g., academia, industrial
labs). A document outlining the purpose of new assignments should accompany
the request. Such a document could be a standards document, or a research
project description. The Designated Expert should consider that there is
sufficient evidence of potential usage both on the end-points (e.g., Mobile
Devices etc.) and the infrastructure (e.g., AAA servers, gateways etc.)"

Please let me know if you have any comments.

Thanks.

-Rajeev