IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] research article about a flat and distributed PMIP scheme

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Mon, 18 July 2011 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA84921F8BB4 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.882, BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gpyIiP3mRh2Z for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FA7A21F8B17 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.70] by nm17.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jul 2011 15:39:29 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.35] by tm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jul 2011 15:39:29 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jul 2011 15:39:29 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 813104.82193.bm@omp1035.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 60631 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jul 2011 15:39:29 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1311003569; bh=sWJKc+hx+WduhTk0ce+MkB2awJYxQQvgWODPV2QaFsg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IT5ltghWkW6PoSSmTo1Icu6lGwfBq43u0J9/r9omglh/j2rM72JLJ5OlMSQsLvVh5TY8f/Q+f/ee6iPOw6qWuvdqJehuhrF8tZogcydbzAlIIUFygaRJU6wmtwns4f2jmXvppj+jHhRs5aFOOGHJd7R/A2F0f4ciKCW+GmE5u7s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YtaGyPK1afyUmMCRzk/R7uf4+3FH2dHCEDalWzoRe0/mhHBPL67ctTyI26gL1w/U3xzKva8ccbzR4X5N9ArM5nX0iq7Pyp4JJBn3k2AINyEbdk25QriXvgBCLzRQq00jQ2chyJ6mMbwIATyJaJt8RS+eo2PCqljUj56M7ykJsos=;
X-YMail-OSG: 2Q4y1eEVM1mR.Bs2yU4lmOb51xtmjjtQUwvYkzbFzykZwK1 7kkgBYoVr5khxhN82BLvHvcblG4TLz7Dp1Zflo4PjBGOi.q0u3IAuj0LtI5x IwxOBGAXzDGawZCLkC0NW_g2UtzI6AzUxlIlSv7QRbSmLHgiYFUpLTTZ2PaW FUav4_WtxhCyGBZYI9EUqX_8uSWBt4lSDbnyycLP0YE4xsjeAn.nBLFB2OEB s1Qc4dxz5P_az0cSwK7glFm.NkXfD0qQj65bzRT3Y7pEjdpmSrrBfofJSCLo dBOYaiphIDrCFKuPkx6RQqDBYAv0WrDlNe8vLbLpO20VG79N7AaV.8AFr0VN 68DEx5uhBZRGU5hZiEtQGtr3VJdbWs39DERrahiego_bxXb5SbZMdzln77xH 0QqhxX5RQH3CyBvYOnyD38sw4rlcfTaiJow--
Received: from [50.58.7.243] by web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:39:29 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/572 YahooMailWebService/0.8.112.307740
References: <CA4876C0.212D2%sgundave@cisco.com> <3E01EE4F-D96D-4149-A48F-88592F2DC639@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <1311003569.47330.YahooMailRC@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:39:29 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <3E01EE4F-D96D-4149-A48F-88592F2DC639@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] research article about a flat and distributed PMIP scheme
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:39:33 -0000

> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> One question though: Isn't  SIP+IEEE 802.21+PMIP vs.  SIP+IEEE 802.21+HIP a 
>comparison of apples and oranges? 
>
> Wouldn't it be more  natural to compare SIP+IEEE 802.21+MIP and SIP+IEEE 
>802.21+HIP as well as  SIP+IEEE 802.21+PMIP and SIP+IEEE 802.21+proxy HIP? 
>
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> PS: Do you know something about the deployment  status of IEEE 802.21? 


I think any work on 802.21 is purely academic at this moment.

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email