Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 10 August 2011 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85DA21F8B67 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3s10Lr8ukVgF for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5E321F8B5E for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkar4 with SMTP id r4so679076bka.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Cys/29ZFJ5Km3aRv3aCiOSYLChFuWl2vhVXFO00s/2E=; b=xE0fINV0VYSF+ozrC5KriOYJ9GizHtfQQ5AlA7bNyPwsTT3oed1KfCEnQG5CZ9h5nM OVfPAEkUb1k1F+wcOTm80GN4DBYm1yMDxOiWOYoB9qBUy+cP4zpHzL9rgpVTyZ1uLwjZ XNtTPvMku4+yYmW12lrYZ5oh9mQcB398VARWA=
Received: by 10.204.9.136 with SMTP id l8mr1175432bkl.1.1313014206472; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a88-114-68-66.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a88-114-68-66.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.68.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y8sm342729bks.54.2011.08.10.15.10.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:10:02 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E62C8913-A3E6-40A1-BE20-0631824322D6@gmail.com>
References: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:09:38 -0000

On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:34 AM, <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Question to WG: 
> 
> 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?
> 
> Yes   [x]
> No    [ ]
> 
> 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
> draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
> feature?
> 
> Yes   [x]
> No    [ ]
> 


- Jouni