[Netext] next steps for netext

There was a lot of interest in ATM many years ago, doesn't mean it's a good
thing. Why can't people describe the reason for wanting to use PMIP for this
sort of thing?? Is there a PS? If not, what are we talking about?

Hesham

On 7/04/09 8:13 PM, "pierrick.seite at orange-ftgroup.com"
<pierrick.seite at orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> At least, this thread shows that there is a lot of interest for
> Inter-technology handover and IP flow mobility with PMIP :-) My understanding
> is that some interesting solutions are suggested (e.g. virtual interface) but
> compliance with NetLMM basics needs clarification. So I definitely agree with
> Telemaco; in a first step, a document giving an overview of solutions and
> assessing host involvement, if any, would help.
> 
> Regards,
> Pierrick
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De?: netext-bounces at mail.mobileip.jp [mailto:netext-
>> bounces at mail.mobileip.jp] De la part de MELIA TELEMACO
>> Envoy??: lundi 6 avril 2009 19:29
>> ??: Jari Arkko; Vijay Devarapalli
>> Cc?: netext at mail.mobileip.jp
>> Objet?: Re: [Netext] next steps for netext
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I think that at this point a pragmatic approach would probably help in
>> solving some of the controversial issues.
>> IETF specified 5213 and as such should also specify how hosts are supposed
>> to behave in a PMIPv6 domain.
>> This should include:
>> - MN to MAG interface: we had, for instance, such a document in Netlmm. It
>> seems that L2 and L3 solutions are being discussed again, we need to
>> document them in an Informational document
>> - Multihoming in PMIPv6: it seems clear there are attractive scenarios
>> people are willing to explore. Again let's capture all of this in an
>> informational document.
>> 
>> Comments?
>> 
>> telemaco
>> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : netext-bounces at mail.mobileip.jp [mailto:netext-
>> bounces at mail.mobileip.jp] De la part de Jari Arkko
>> Envoy? : lundi 6 avril 2009 19:03
>> ? : Vijay Devarapalli
>> Cc : netext at mail.mobileip.jp
>> Objet : Re: [Netext] next steps for netext
>> 
>> Vijay ,
>> 
>>> There was quite a bit of confusion on the "host changes" at the BoF. I
>>> hope we are not taking decisions based on this confusion. That would
>>> be very disappointing.
>>> 
>> 
>> We are not making any decisions yet about the confused or controversial
>> parts. I sent out the charter so that we can at least move forward with
>> the rest. I'd be interested in hearing ideas on how to move forward with
>> the inter-access and multihoming parts.
>> 
>> Jari
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetExt mailing list
>> NetExt at mail.mobileip.jp
>> http://www.mobileip.jp/mailman/listinfo/netext
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetExt mailing list
>> NetExt at mail.mobileip.jp
>> http://www.mobileip.jp/mailman/listinfo/netext
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetExt mailing list
> NetExt at mail.mobileip.jp
> http://www.mobileip.jp/mailman/listinfo/netext