[netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 09:23 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF121F84F6 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 02:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.382, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TEwIHS2vYWf1 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 02:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974E421F84F4 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 02:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id q6D9Ni5H010892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:23:44 +0200
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6D9NhGx028289 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:23:43 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id q6D9NhoK003584 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:23:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4FFFE91F.8030006@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:23:43 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:23:11 -0000
NETEXT WG members, It was said at times that PMIP-NEMO is impossible. PMIP is a core network protocol, where mobility is supported without modifying the MN. Or, in some PMIP-NEMO proposals, the MN _is_ modified: for example it adds DHCP Client on it; or other times it performs HNP Division. BEcause of this there exist statements that PMIP-NEMO is impossible. Do you think there are other reasons why PMIP-NEMO is impossible? Do you think that running DHCP Client on MN is a modification to MN? Alex
- [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Basavaraj.Patil