Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 as Netext WG doc?

The charter is quite explicit about not venturing into any extensions that
require MN changes.
Hence I would say that MN initiated flow mobility is OUT OF SCOPE for this
work item.

-Raj

On 8/11/11 10:46 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
wrote:

>Hi Pierrick,
>
>I think that once the draft becomes WG document, as long as it fits in
>the charter, it's up to the WG to decide if MN initiated mobility should
>be also considered.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Carlos
>
>On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:42 +0200, pierrick.seite@orange-ftgroup.com
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm in favor of this document but I've one question:
>> 
>> In the current version, the LMA makes decision to move flows and the MN
>> follows that decision to forward packets on the right interface.
>> However, during IETf80, we had good arguments in favour of the MN making
>> decision to move flows.
>> 
>> So, the question is: do you plan, in this I-D, to consider also MN
>> initiated mobility management or shall we consider only network
>> initiated mobility  ?
>> 
>> Pierrick
>> 
>> > 
>> > Betreff: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D
>> draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-
>> > flowmob-03 as Netext WG doc?
>> > 
>> > Hello,
>> > 
>> > At IETF81 the chairs made a proposal to adopt as WG I-D: Proxy Mobile
>> IPv6
>> > Extensions to Support Flow Mobility
>> > <draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03> As the starting point for
>> > the specification defining flow mobility for Proxy Mobile IPv6.
>> > We gauged support for and against adopting this I-D at the IETF81 WG
>> > meeting with the following result:
>> > 
>> > In favor: 18
>> > Opposed: None
>> > 
>> > As per process we are following up on the mailing list with the same
>> > question. Please respond by Aug 18th, 2011 to the question below:
>> > 
>> > Q: Should we adopt as Netext WG I-D the document:
>> > draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 which will be used as the
>> > starting point in specifying the flow mobility feature for Proxy
>> > Mobile IPv6?
>> > 
>> > Yes   [ ]
>> > No    [ ]
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -Chairs
>> > 
>> > IETF81 WG minutes are posted at:
>> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > netext mailing list
>> > netext@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > netext mailing list
>> > netext@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>
>-- 
>Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano  http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
>GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67