Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob

[Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <[e-mail]>]

Hi Behcet,

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:06 -0600, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>         Hi Behcet,
>         
>         On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:35 -0600, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>         > Hi Carlos,
>         >
>         >
>         > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
>         > <[e-mail]> wrote:
>         >         Hi,
>         >
>         >         I'm restarting the discussion about the flow
>         mobility draft.
>         >         3GPP is
>         >         considering NB-IFOM again for Rel-13, so I think we
>         should
>         >         close this
>         >         document as soon as possible.
>         >
>         >         As discussed during the last meeting, all the issues
>         were
>         >         cleared. Rajeev
>         >         made some comments on issue #15, brought by
>         Pierrick, on the
>         >         use of
>         >         update notifications. Rajeev, are you OK with the
>         proposed
>         >         resolution?
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > I made many comments on the issue tracker, on the list and
>         in
>         > meetings.
>         >
>         > Actually we comments have now been culminated in HA-based
>         flow
>         > mobility protocol as in RFC 7109 (please see my previous
>         mail on the
>         > list).
>         >
>         >
>         > You always preferred to ignore them, why?
>         
>         
>         The WG agreed on how to resolve all your issues. The document
>         reflects
>         the WG consensus. I even remember Suresh going one by one in
>         one meeting
>         and everybody agreed.
>         
> 
> 
> No.
> 
> 
> Will you please reply what follows below?

Sure.

>  
> 
>         Carlos
>         >
>         
>  I remember very well, in the last face-to-face meeting the chairs
> asked you to meet with me during the meeting and try to resolve the
>   issues face to face.
> 
>   I saw you in the breaks, you never attempted to talk to me. I was
> ready to talk.
> 
Was I expected to come to you? I don't think the WG asked me to do
that... I was also ready to talk.

Carlos

> ?
> 
> > Again, I think that PMIPv6 flow mobility protocol should be
> compatible
> > with RFC 7109 because on this way the implementers can reuse HA code
> > for PMIPv6 as well.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Behcet
> >
> >         BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
> >         draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we
> should
> >         also
> >         close that document.
> >
> >         Thanks,
> >
> >         Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         netext mailing list
> >         [e-mail]
> >         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>