Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F36D21F8BA9 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.138, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cNzj4KXwuFrG for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA03F21F8B62 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [82.239.213.32]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DF8940113 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:50:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E4D34C9.5050507@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:50:33 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: netext@ietf.org
References: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110818-0, 18/08/2011), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:49:51 -0000

Hello Raj,

Le 10/08/2011 23:34, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com a écrit :
>
> At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for
> Proxy Mobile IPv6"<draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt>
>
> General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation
> is a required feature for PMIP6.

Please specify whether this prefix delegation feature is for the goal of 
supporting Network Mobility with PMIP?

Or is it to assign the HNP to the Mobile Host (not necessarily to assign 
MNP for NEMO Mobile Router)?  The two goals are distinctive IMHO.

This to help formulate a problem for prefix delegation for PMIP.

[...]
> We are now following up with the questions on the ML.
>
> Question to WG:
>
> 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?
>
> Yes   [ ]
> No    [ ]

Yes, if it is for MNP for Mobile Router.

> 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
> draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
> feature?
>
> Yes   [ ]
> No    [ ]

No, unless the problem is clearer.

I hope this helps.

Alex

>
> Please respond by August 18th on the ML.
>
> -Chairs
>
> Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>