Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-08.txt]
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A13711E8245 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.05 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.549, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FA1lKQUB3Mgv for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1040D11E81CD for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w7so22568lbi.4 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AJBKdeiBZFXfHebYgrQiKa9PdD1fyeWX9DAv6ku9f0E=; b=GgWn0BwI/MraUDoIfAbKrytW4pCvkanQakgPXHEYEXYjkPeGQyAuf1Mbwg9HrT1myL bocHIpxUN1cpMvbQel+hGwJWU54arcNOTJgmVmXnx81ue5vhsYPz3c7PzKCRWsXM8ukT OmYLvWkwqprIiVGsQyFsU5ohiwFEIUShMMvA4HOtREVCrjuaU2Hw5lbDuDMoyvxD+jmo kvIGV7C5lW9E+mcXzNyHOGo8WMpn9nvB18m8l3YZJZKMigC+TR4WKngFyHLOr2wt6nsl XtMeAuPiFwdaSieITVQXyWv7GDKw2BJw9PwtOx55/0J4TUpWKYXrxRhqGKryaSRtjBLw CVrg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.155.70 with SMTP id vu6mr2943694lbb.41.1382475258987; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.98.227 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7C52FDEBC843C44DBAF2CA6A30662C6D0162233E@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
References: <1382455119.3908.60.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <7C52FDEBC843C44DBAF2CA6A30662C6D0162233E@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:54:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAce_fqHdBFLxw=ySdzYAMH2oRbphu-Nkbh9kGRU9mucV2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: "Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)" <rkoodli@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115fe1eb90bf004e95a9a18"
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-08.txt]
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:54:22 -0000
Carlos, In addition to what Rajeev said, I had many comments. In fact I don't remember at all any comment that asked to remove FM messages :-). What happened to those comments? Regards, Behcet On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli) <rkoodli@cisco.com > wrote: > > Carlos, > > I raised the issue of FMI vs UPN right after the Berlin meeting. > As said, I may have missed any agreement on this.. But I did not see any > response to how/when this was reached (if any). > > Please spend some time going on this at Vancouver. > > Thanks. > > -Rajeev > > > On 10/22/13 8:18 AM, "Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> > wrote: > > >Hi Rajeev, > > > >On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 05:22 +0000, Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli) wrote: > >> Right, we needed to discuss this before putting text - especially I saw > >>no > >> response to my email about this after the last IETF meeting. > > > >BTW, I presented all the proposed changes that have been incorporated in > >-07 and -08 during the Berlin meeting > >(http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-netext-6.pdf). > > > >You are specifically pointing to issue #15, brought by Pierrick a while > >ago (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/15). This was > >discussed before Berlin on the mailing list and I responded to the > >issue. I presented the proposed changes in slide 9 of my presentation > >and there was consensus on going for it. > > > >All the proposed changes were agreed by the WG, so as the editor of the > >document I simply proceeded to apply them. > > > >Regards, > > > >Carlos > > > >> > >> In particular, I am not sure about having to implement the UPN spec for > >> one to do FM. Let's discuss what this means; may be I don't fully > >>follow.. > >> Perhaps Carlos could spend some time at Vancouver on this. > >> > >> It would help me if the following is shown with some text for the ID. > >> I don't see what the text duplication is. If the text is there for UPN, > >>we > >> can re-use it. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -Rajeev > >> > >> > >> On 10/21/13 4:16 PM, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi Carlos/Rajeev: > >> > > >> >I agree, we did not resolve this issue one way or the other. > >> > > >> >How about the following ? > >> > > >> >We can still the keep the FMI message, its use and the text in the > >>spec. > >> >No changes are needed. But, under the wrappers, FMI message can be a > >>UPN > >> >message with a NR code of "FMI". So, in the format section, we point to > >> >the UPN message. > >> > > >> >Otherwise, we have to add all the considerations around security, IPSec > >> >PAD entries, IPv4 transport, ..etc and that is not there currently in > >>the > >> >spec. May end up duplicating lot of text. Even for implementation, its > >> >additional bit of text dealing with a new message type. > >> > > >> >This has least impact on the existing text. Else, we need to revert to > >>the > >> >prev version. > >> > > >> >Is this a reasonable way-forward ? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Regards > >> >Sri > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On 10/21/13 3:30 PM, "Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)" <rkoodli@cisco.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >>Hi Carlos, > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>On 10/21/13 3:24 PM, "Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>Hi, > >> >>> > >> >>>Following the discussion during the last meeting, I've updated the > >> >>>draft. As requested by the WG, it now uses the Update Notifications > >>for > >> >>>Proxy Mobile IPv6. > >> >> > >> >>Hmm? I don't recall any discussion on this..Perhaps I missed the > >> >>response(s) to my email. > >> >>We need to discuss this :) > >> >> > >> >>-Rajeev > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>>Comments are welcome. I'd like to ask people that submitted an issue > >>to > >> >>>the tracker to see if you are happy with the revision (and close the > >> >>>issue if that is the case). > >> >>> > >> >>>Thanks, > >> >>> > >> >>>Carlos > >> >> > >> >>_______________________________________________ > >> >>netext mailing list > >> >>netext@ietf.org > >> >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > >> > > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >
- [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flo… internet-drafts
- [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmip… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano