Re: [netext] AD review of draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

Sri:

Thanks for the update! I have reviewed the changes and they look good to me with one exception (below). I have in any case requested an IETF Last Call to be initiated and expect that you fix the remaining issues by issuing yet another draft quickly.

But the changes are pretty big -- it would also be useful if members of the WG reviewed the document while it is in the Last Call.

> o  When sending the Mobile Node Group Identifier option in the
>   binding update messages related to the individual session
>   establishment, the Bulk-Binding-Update (B) flag in the request
>   MUST be set to a value of (1).  However, when initiating any
>   binding update operations with group specific scope, the Bulk-
>   Binding-Update (B) flag in the request MUST always be set to a
>   value of (0), with the Mobile Node Group Identifier option present
>   in the request.

There is something wrong with the above text. B must be set in the session establishment, but not with "binding update operations with group specific scope"? (And what are those?)

Jari