Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip6-06 Mon, 20 May 2013 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5235421F8EA6; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.795
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1tJjiRVbg1L; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A20F21F8D94; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id BB9B9B18AC; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:39:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from (unknown []) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 4397A71C78C; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:39:02 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP id r4K9cvlc070581; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:38:57 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
In-Reply-To: <>
To: Basavaraj Patil <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 0B4B4ADC:0FE7B8A3-48257B71:0032E28E; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:38:56 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2013-05-20 17:38:57, Serialize complete at 2013-05-20 17:38:57
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0035066648257B71_="
X-MAIL: r4K9cvlc070581
Cc: "" <>, "" <>,
Subject: Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip6-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:39:44 -0000

Hello Raj,

Thanks for your review.

A new version (-08) of the draft has been submitted. Your comments below 
are addressed in this version.

The draft is ready for WGLC now. Thanks.

Best Regards,

Basavaraj Patil <> 
2013-04-04 01:59

"" <>
[netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip6-06


1. In the terminology section:
   "The DMNP is an IPv4 or an IPv6 prefix delegated to a mobile router
      and advertised in the mobile network."

      What is the mobile network being refered to in this statement?
      Is it the PMIP6 domain itself? Or is it the network that the
      mobile router is hosting?

2. In Sec 4.3.1:
   "It is possible that the delegated prefix(es) may
       have been assigned to the MAG by the LMA during this procedure of
       PMIPv6 tunnel establishment.  That is the MAG may include one (or
       more) Delegated Mobile Network Prefix (DMNP) mobility options
       which MUST be set to the unspecified IPv6 address "::" in the PBU
       to request the delegated prefix(es).  The LMA assigns a new set
       of DMNP(s) in PBA message."

       Not sure what your assumptions are here. Why does the LMA
       assign delegated prefix(es) during normal RFC5213 PMIP6 tunnel
       establishment procedures?
       What would cause the MAG to include the DMNP option in the PBU
       at this stage (Step 2) of the session?

3. In Sec 4.3.1:
   " The mobile router, acting as a "Requesting Router" as described
       in [RFC3633], sends a DHCPv6 SOLICIT message including one or
       more IA_PD option(s) to the mobile access gateway (which has a
       "DHCPv6 Server" function) to acquire the delegated prefix(es)."

       Is there an assumption that the MAG is also the DHCPv6 server?
       The MAG could be a DHCP relay as well, right?

4. In Sec 4.3.1, step 5:
   "The LMA must set
       up forwarding for the delegated prefixes as reachable through the
       PMIPv6 tunnel."

       The LMA may or may not assign these delegated prefixes. The MAG
       could be the one assigning the delegated prefixes as per the
       description. Are those prefixes routable by the LMA?

5. In Sec 4.4.1, step 4:
   "If the mobile access
        gateway does not know the delegated prefix(es), then the
        delegated mobile network prefix in the DMNP option(s) MUST be
        set to the unspecified IPv6 address "::", "

How would the MAG know the delegated prefix(es)? Unless it is
just renewing the assigned prefix(es)?

6. Is the assumption that the DHCP server functionality resides either
   at the MAG or the LMA in this I-D?

7. In Sec 6.2 you state:
   "In order to receive these packets, the
      local mobility anchor MUST be the topological anchor of the MR's
      delegated mobile network prefix(es)."

      This should be made clear up front in order to avoid confusion
      about how forwarding is accomplished.


s/Proxy Mobile IPv6 enables IP mobility for a host without requiring
   its participation in any mobility signaling, being the network
   responsible for managing IP mobility on behalf of the host./ Proxy
   Mobile IPv6 enables IP mobility for a host without requiring 
   its participation in any mobility signaling. Mobility elements in
   the network are responsible for managing IP mobility on behalf of
   the host. 

   Proxy Mobile IPv6 does not support assigning a prefix to a router and
   managing its IP mobility./However, Proxy Mobile IPv6 lacks the
   ability to assign a prefix to a router and  manage its IP

s/and be able to obtain IP mobility support for those IP addresses./
   and enable IP mobility support for the assigned IP address or

   this network-based mobility management support is specific to an IP
   host and currently there is no such network-based mobility management
   support for a mobile router with a cluster of IP hosts behind 
   the Proxy Mobile IPv6 based solution for  network-based mobility
   management is specific to IP hosts and does not provide similar
   functionality for a mobile router with a cluster of IP hosts behind

netext mailing list