Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

<jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com> Wed, 17 August 2011 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331CC21F8B2A for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.323
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.323 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.928, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlK-oCIdu6gG for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail27.messagelabs.com (mail27.messagelabs.com [193.109.254.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E05721F8AFB for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Env-Sender: jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1313578897!45148097!1
X-Originating-IP: [213.174.82.10]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.3.6; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 29132 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2011 11:01:38 -0000
Received: from renexfe01.roe2.renesasmobile.com (HELO renexfe01.roe2.renesasmobile.com) (213.174.82.10) by server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Aug 2011 11:01:38 -0000
Received: from RENEXMB02.roe2.renesasmobile.com ([fe80::b101:43e1:dd7b:2fbb]) by renexfe01.roe2.renesasmobile.com ([fe80::ec94:bbb3:68e:a94a%18]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:01:43 +0300
From: jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com
To: thumax9@gmail.com, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, netext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
Thread-Index: AQHMXM0LZrI505ce4EaH/FTGDeHhVQ==
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:01:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CA717A1D.4FE5B%jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPi1m94DfZROez9ptB5xuc=HvW+o-V+9mqUiBXPs0304+XQXbg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, da-DK
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.22.233]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA717A1D4FE5Bjonnesoininenrenesasmobilecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:01:03 -0000

Hi,

Like I said during the meeting, I vote yes on both questions.

Cheers,

Jonne.
--
Jonne Soininen
Renesas Mobile

Tel: +358 40 527 4634
E-mail: jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com


From: 马骁 <thumax9@gmail.com<mailto:thumax9@gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:33:16 +0800
To: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com<mailto:Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>>, netext <netext@ietf.org<mailto:netext@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

Q1. Yes
Q2. Yes

Best Regards,
Xiao Ma

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for
Proxy Mobile IPv6" <draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt>

General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation
is a required feature for PMIP6. We gauged the interest in the room to
adopt this I-D as the starting point of a WG I-D for the PD feature
and observed the following:

"
Chairs: how many people think the problem is relevant: 19
How many have read it: 7
How many think that the proposed solution in the draft can be starting
point to work on the problem?
In favor: 7 ;  Opposed: 1
"

We are now following up with the questions on the ML.

Question to WG:

1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?

Yes   [ ]
No    [ ]

2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
feature?

Yes   [ ]
No    [ ]

Please respond by August 18th on the ML.

-Chairs

Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt

_______________________________________________ netext mailing list netext@ietf.org<mailto:netext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext