Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn Thu, 11 August 2011 02:33 UTC
Return-Path: <zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0375E800D; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.460, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jlL+vcqeU1SW; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D835E800C; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 152363502467742; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:27:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 21414.5406157678; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:34:05 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p7B2YEJZ071472; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:34:14 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 5FF8152F:7DE95A2C-482578E9:00081794; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF5FF8152F.7DE95A2C-ON482578E9.00081794-482578E9.000DFC8D@zte.com.cn>
From: zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:33:54 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-08-11 10:34:15, Serialize complete at 2011-08-11 10:34:15
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000DFC8C482578E9_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn p7B2YEJZ071472
Cc: netext@ietf.org, netext-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:33:52 -0000
Question to WG: 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6? Yes [X ] No [ ] 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D: draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this feature? Yes [X ] No [ ] <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> 发件人: netext-bounces@ietf.org 2011-08-11 上午 05:34 收件人 <netext@ietf.org> 抄送 主题 [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6? At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6" <draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt> General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation is a required feature for PMIP6. We gauged the interest in the room to adopt this I-D as the starting point of a WG I-D for the PD feature and observed the following: " Chairs: how many people think the problem is relevant: 19 How many have read it: 7 How many think that the proposed solution in the draft can be starting point to work on the problem? In favor: 7 ; Opposed: 1 " We are now following up with the questions on the ML. Question to WG: 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6? Yes [ ] No [ ] 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D: draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this feature? Yes [ ] No [ ] Please respond by August 18th on the ML. -Chairs Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt _______________________________________________ netext mailing list netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
- [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefi… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jouni
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… zhou.xingyue
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… zhu.chunhui
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jiang Dong
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… 马骁
- [netext] 答复: Re: Consensus call: Work on specifyi… zhou.xingyue
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… jonne.soininen
- Re: [netext] 答复: Re: Consensus call: Work on spec… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… liu dapeng
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Hui Deng
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jouni
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] 答复: Re: Consensus call: Work on spec… Daniel Migault
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… jouni korhonen
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu