IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] [dmm] novel research article about DMM

Bokor Laszlo <goodzi@gmail.com> Fri, 15 July 2011 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <goodzi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD59C21F8545; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vByFmc0vnNAK; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961EF21F85DE; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so1171998vxi.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Zr2Qxl41GeG5rHDSJZzE5Vf/AMuRhIDluBMD+aRsJ4k=; b=wiiL6Qdjkg0vh1Vs7/Hfiiigf1GKUEcM1PrjljBrBMYxyG/p33X3zsRX37rJryURDw bntbC5b7ht6MzAsLLZaNzkxoyeoqW698xLQcFN4rA/84K/qMtSR+xLVyIQ+CTjBwajwc 43ZA8nXzwLK/KkgUTZ+HTbdml0IvGszzRyZl8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.88.76 with SMTP id be12mr3607635vdb.366.1310727470703; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.165.233 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25BC2EA032@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <CAPLDCSyQCtDe9SEJ8NTrcq07wOdf9oekqSd94g9_H8KrdD+BwA@mail.gmail.com> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25BC2EA032@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:57:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLDCSzq3mM_C52V7VhaRCZpeu3dT+tV=LfLRtQRZURtGwsHjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bokor Laszlo <goodzi@gmail.com>
To: Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307f35e649e35004a819851b"
Cc: netext@ietf.org, dmm@ietf.org, mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] [dmm] novel research article about DMM
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:57:56 -0000

Dear Dirk,

yes, we are planning to extend our analysis to new approaches and schemes
not yet examined. In this matter it would be great if you could point on
some particular schemes which are worth dealing with from the WG's point of
view.

Best regards,
goodzi

--
László BOKOR
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME)
Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK)
Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307
web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~bokorl

2011/7/14 <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>

> **
>  Dear goodzi,
> from the abstract and figures available at the links you provided it seems
> to me that PMIP and HIP achieve scores of +/- 1 regarding deployment,
> security, performance, and objective (whatever this means) ('nearly same
> performance, but HIP-based scheme got slightly better scores under
> evaluation criteria due to stronger security and fewer functional modules to
> deploy') - but I can't draw any conclusions for further extensions ...
> especially towards various DMM proposals as outlined in
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00
>
> or/and
>
> **
> *http://www.psg.com/~charliep/txt/ietf81/draft-perkins-dmm-matrix-00.txt*<http://www.psg.com/%7Echarliep/txt/ietf81/draft-perkins-dmm-matrix-00.txt>
> Would it be possible to extend your analysis method also to such new
> approaches under discussion?
>
> Best regards
> Dirk
>
>  ------------------------------
> *Von:* dmm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] *Im Auftrag von
> *Bokor Laszlo
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 12:45
> *An:* dmm
> *Betreff:* [dmm] novel research article about DMM
>
> Dear Folks,
>
> please let me advertise you a research paper in the area of DMM and future
> flat mobile networks:
>
> Title: Evaluation of two integrated signalling schemes for the Ultra Flat
> Architecture using SIP, IEEE 802.21, and HIP/PMIP protocols
> ACM link: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1975468
> DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.005
>
> I hope you will find the above article interesting, and also that you will
> provide us with feedbacks on our work.
>
> Best regards,
> goodzi
>
> --
> László BOKOR
> Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME)
> Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK)
> Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307
> web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~bokorl
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email