Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-03.txt

Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com> Fri, 09 September 2011 04:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3303E21F8B04 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.895, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWJbTdXQ2+LX for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF7521F8B03 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sgundave@cisco.com; l=4136; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1315542863; x=1316752463; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=ASfGvs2Tp6b66m3OtjkqBtp4gkXCWhmuWAeBKbaiTbE=; b=QFT9+8LyW1i78cDLNU4VyMM83spS4pe3bJr+xSCsvZELyXok4KcCVflA pQ5x8gKTOrJ8wYurEtd7SQTZs5LiU6IbnmAQrtIK0lgxbEEDrInWcj1zD XD9BpPNtfbywmhBeyRk2zrTGDMYfrAHDx64H65/Tu3d54MfAvkFgmr5tw I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAOuWaU6rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABCpwh9eIFGAQEBAQIBAQEBDwEpATEQDQEIGE8GMAEBBAESCRmHUwSZWAGeQYZtBIc9L4tHhRuEZ4cz
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,354,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="1082816"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2011 04:34:21 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p894YLZ2031736; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 04:34:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-214.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.145]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:34:21 -0700
Received: from 10.32.246.213 ([10.32.246.213]) by xmb-sjc-214.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.145]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 04:34:21 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:34:17 -0700
From: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>, netext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CA8EE559.27E7F%sgundave@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcxuqbwGKIQpDXPM4ky+XZofJzGQwg==
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjvw1iS=+Yd=p8mdh3Lnhv1dubQBjg+9uuHGJNJSk+hJQw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2011 04:34:21.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEB36CE0:01CC6EA9]
Subject: Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-03.txt
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:32:37 -0000

Hi Julien,

I know we discussed about this during the meeting, on wow the logical
interface should appear to the applications. You preferred to not to state
any thing. I was ok with that, I just wanted to check the socket API, and if
there is any API which provides the type (p2p or non-p2p), based on that we
can resolve this. Let me work on this.



Regards
Sri



 



On 9/8/11 9:04 AM, "Julien Laganier" <julien.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I thought that we already discussed this and concluded it wasn't appropriate?
> 
> 6.3.  Supported Link models for a logical interface
> 
>    The sub-interfaces of a logical interface can be bound to a point-to-
>    point or a shared link (Example: LTE and WLAN).  The logical
>    interface appears as a shared-link to the applications, and adapts to
>    the link model of the sub-interface for packet communication.  For
>    example, when transmitting a packet on a sub-interface which is
>    attached to a p2p link, the transmission conforms to the p2p link
>    model and when transmitting on a sub-interface attached to a shared
>    link, the transmission conforms to the shared link model.
> 
>    Based on the link to which the sub-interface is attached to, the
>    layer-2 resolutions may or may not be needed.  If the interface is
>    bound to a P2P link with PPP running, there will not be any link-
>    layer resolutions in the form of ARP/ND messages.  However, if the
>    interface is bound to a shared link such as Ethernet, there will be
>    ND resolutions.  The logical interface implementation has to maintain
>    the required link model and the associated state for each sub-
>    interface.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:15 AM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility
>> Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>>        Title           : Logical Interface Support for multi-mode IP Hosts
>>        Author(s)       : Telemaco Melia
>>                          Sri Gundavelli
>>        Filename        : draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-03.txt
>>        Pages           : 26
>>        Date            : 2011-09-05
>> 
>>   A Logical Interface is a software semantic internal to the host
>>   operating system.  This semantic is available in all popular
>>   operating systems and is used in various protocol implementations.
>>   The Logical Interface support is required on the mobile node
>>   operating in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain, for leveraging various
>>   network-based mobility management features such as inter-technology
>>   handoffs, multihoming and flow mobility support.  This document
>>   explains the operational details of Logical Interface construct and
>>   the specifics on how the link-layer implementations hide the physical
>>   interfaces from the IP stack and from the network nodes on the
>>   attached access networks.  Furthermore, this document identifies the
>>   applicability of this approach to various link-layer technologies and
>>   analyzes the issues around it when used in context with various
>>   mobility management features.
>> 
>> 
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-suppo
>> rt-03.txt
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-suppor
>> t-03.txt
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext