IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-01

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 10 November 2011 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D9521F8485; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fo21GelTRet9; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA8221F8482; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bkbzv15 with SMTP id zv15so3311442bkb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=yTcqpc2i7dQJRrWWuWrMs5/U0DPytHhcVFSAhPHMoLE=; b=kQ0OSJjS/XRDh8G8uiSp48yYyzVS4fjlPdxNrsK0qFNopULzWxUV4aqtysauqi1wfh 9791N9SglAxs0tG32amE1Aut4/Ij3kUwtv4kZTHXXHuYYQwhpSSPu1hkezMLrYQOYIxe DVWy8tjTmlTox9FGbpQk5UMiUuqJwIFc3o7dA=
Received: by 10.204.152.25 with SMTP id e25mr6167604bkw.51.1320956490735; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [62.237.209.70] ([62.237.209.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r12sm8549570bkw.5.2011.11.10.12.21.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF69C8640F.9EAA66B4-ON48257944.003FA1B5-48257944.0044C676@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:21:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <23E4A915-9B63-4EA8-814A-C442EE007A1B@gmail.com>
References: <OF69C8640F.9EAA66B4-ON48257944.003FA1B5-48257944.0044C676@zte.com.cn>
To: zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn, "<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Patil" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: netext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip@tools.ietf.org, netext-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-01
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:21:32 -0000

Raj,

On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:30 PM, zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn wrote:

> > 4. If the prefixes (delegated) are provided by a DHCP server (and not
> >    the LMA), how does the LMA get informed about these? In the PBU?
> >    How do you ensure that
> >    "All the mobile network prefixes managed in the DR MUST be
> >    reachable via local mobility anchor (LMA)" when they are not
> >    assigned by the LMA? 
> [Joy]Here it assumes that the LMA can interact with the DHCPv6 Server within some other mechanisms e.g. Radius.

The situation is the same as with PMIP6 and DHCPv6 in general. The DHCPv6 server and the LMA has to be in sync. There is no need for an interface as everything can be managed with configuration. But that does not preclude having an interface between the LMA and the DHCPv6 server.

- Jouni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email