[netext] PMIP-PD: usefulness of separation DHCP Server from LMA
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 23:26 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0024511E8225 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.202, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRT9fCvgFzpe for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061CF11E8334 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so8571226ggn.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9CCOeVpnX893dlgFX5pqOcb2RltuCfbe4pBl+vw5U9c=; b=TTjIXRdm2303egRWWo7Yvk29UT8KkkHoXCFaw/UM0yNec7pDilawy/dXmndboEir4Y 63cYJvW7aeIn1IJ32g3wOyUgYrPsAM/sKYuMWHoKfToVXXTQN3RRCHphuuzGfTtNIVu6 knOE1QyOwqjlzJtl7mMHQd4wr11XMZtl8YKeZ2yohHybIVCs26CNWxAT4SG/5myGreLf 4GsOej79YhO0yTUeErgw5/SLH01H4LEpHlurgWe+1nn8SkzEk7vqLG4M7MMOoKF/3+db YMDCbhMmyCaPdCHhKl4nFSTVOjaQ6oAA+E8P3wnip/RgmYuZi7zmYLnH+DG29JwQQ8ei FtFQ==
Received: by 10.60.2.105 with SMTP id 9mr31504096oet.65.1343863591446; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm2805012oef.6.2012.08.01.16.26.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5019BB1C.9070003@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:20 -0700
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [netext] PMIP-PD: usefulness of separation DHCP Server from LMA
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:26:33 -0000
Do you think it would be advantageous to have the ability to separate the DHCP Server from the LMA? I think yes, because it would give more options to deployments. This is in relationship with draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03 Alex
- [netext] PMIP-PD: usefulness of separation DHCP S… Alexandru Petrescu