Re: [netext] Flow Mobility Draft

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 24 July 2014 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CBA1A02E7 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHylxlK2T16f for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9C11A02EC for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD1B88116; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b444.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b444.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.180.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A5313680C0; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D11478.9050402@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:13:12 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
References: <CFF53D90.14FE0B%sgundave@cisco.com> <53CFF515.9040706@innovationslab.net> <CAC8QAcesq5v69n+ajnmU9hJ1bhWX_muBOkYg2Y_MjfQnU7AqPQ@mail.gmail.com> <53D10901.4000103@innovationslab.net> <CAC8QAceOL--ognqZ7hy2rOBDkArFqiHm8s0DOkJtmtEbvUDvMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAceOL--ognqZ7hy2rOBDkArFqiHm8s0DOkJtmtEbvUDvMg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wfHLqOolqF7E9HW7unfiq9M5A6qMpHXLm"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/R9dxaoxcGOzwGj6801FsVhIzND4
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Flow Mobility Draft
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:13:23 -0000


On 7/24/14 10:10 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Another issue with the editor has been his attuitude. He has always
> been stubborn he never said things like why don't you provide some
> text? or let's edit the document together.
> 
> This document has not originated from his own document, it has come
> out of a design team so the editor's rigid approach was not warranted.

This document is a WG document.  That means there must be consensus to
add/delete/change text.  Show me the consensus to make the changes you
proposed.

Regards,
Brian