Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Fri, 19 August 2011 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7821F8A69 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EsK7MNxwtY60 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC6421F86B6 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh101.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.22]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p7JHis0W006416; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:44:59 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:44:43 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.61) by NOK-AM1MHUB-03.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:44:43 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-051.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.86]) by 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:44:43 +0200
From: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
To: <sarikaya@ieee.org>, <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
Thread-Index: AQHMXn3qkDS+mGKLekOXSUG2PEKO3pUkJ9IA///VMwA=
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:44:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CA740AB0.1D678%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1313767074.5573.YahooMailNeo@web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D75C42CFC877CB4EA3DACC07E50B2AD6@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Aug 2011 17:44:43.0272 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD9CF880:01CC5E97]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:44:06 -0000

Behcet,

Please read the following email:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02130.html
that I posted to the list.

There is no good solution to the critical issue that has been raised by
Julien et al.
If you or anyone has a good solution, please convince the WG.

At this time the I-D will be accepted as WG doc without this feature
included. Period.

-Raj

On 8/19/11 10:17 AM, "ext Behcet Sarikaya" <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Hello,
>
>
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> The consensus call on whether to adopt as WG I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6
>> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility,
>> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 has now been completed.
>> Please see
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02068.html for
>> the details of the consensus call itself.
>> 
>> Conclusion is as follows:
>> 
>> There is strong consensus to adopt the I-D as the starting point of
>> the work in the working group with the condition that the LMA
>> initiated flow switching feature be removed from the text prior to it
>> being posted as the WG doc.
>
>
>Remove LMA initiated flow switching?
>
>What are you talking about?
>
>It is 95% of the draft. The design team agreed to make it LMA initiated.
>
>
>
>I could not see the consensus on this technical issue from the mail, how
>did it come about?
>
>Talk to Yokota-san, he is going to tell you why LMA/HA initiated flow
>switching is feasible and should be done.
>
>Regards,
>
>Behcet
>