From: BOC Michael <michael.boc@cea.fr>
To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>,
 "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNYvKCvhAGL3znHEuOVmE7wTRHpJcrmk7g
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:12:56 +0000
Message-ID: <94D2EEADE1F74740979E8041CBA339380355A4EB@EXDAG0-B3.intra.cea.fr>
References: <20120716012903.13491.99397.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120716012903.13491.99397.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
Precedence: list

Hello all,

Concerning this draft, I would like to know why you need to set the R flag =
in PBU=20
(because you don't explain it in the draft) and if your approach is to not =
take=20
into account possible hints in IA_PD(s). If this is the case, we just have =
to provide=20
MNP(s) at MR attachment with the HNP(s) and we move on another subject.  =20

Regards,


Michael


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De=A0: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] De la
> part de internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Envoy=E9=A0: lundi 16 juillet 2012 03:29
> =C0=A0: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc=A0: netext@ietf.org
> Objet=A0: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
>=20
>=20
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions
> Working Group of the IETF.
>=20
> 	Title           : Prefix Delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6
> 	Author(s)       : Xingyue Zhou
>                           Jouni Korhonen
>                           Carl Williams
>                           Sri Gundavelli
>                           Carlos J. Bernardos
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 16
> 	Date            : 2012-07-15
>=20
> Abstract:
>    Proxy Mobile IPv6 enables IP mobility for a host without requiring
>    its participation in any mobility signaling, being the network
>    responsible for managing IP mobility on behalf of the host.
> However,
>    Proxy Mobile IPv6 does not support assigning a prefix to a router
> and
>    managing its IP mobility.  This document specifies an extension to
>    Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol for supporting network mobility using
>    DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation.
>=20
>=20
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip
>=20
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03
>=20
> A diff from previous version is available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03
>=20
>=20
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext