Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob

Hi Rajeev,

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:30 -0800, Rajeev Koodli wrote:
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> 
> what is the proposed resolution?
> 
The consensus of the WG was to use the Update Notifications (issue #15),
as per draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications (now RFC7077). This is was
presented in Vancouver.

Thanks,

Carlos

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> -Rajeev
> 
> 
> >As discussed during the last meeting, all the issues were cleared.
> Rajeev
> >made some comments on issue #15, brought by Pierrick, on the use of
> >update notifications. Rajeev, are you OK with the proposed
> resolution?
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
>         Hi,
>         
>         I'm restarting the discussion about the flow mobility draft.
>         3GPP is
>         considering NB-IFOM again for Rel-13, so I think we should
>         close this
>         document as soon as possible.
>         
>         As discussed during the last meeting, all the issues were
>         cleared. Rajeev
>         made some comments on issue #15, brought by Pierrick, on the
>         use of
>         update notifications. Rajeev, are you OK with the proposed
>         resolution?
>         
>         BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
>         draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we should
>         also
>         close that document.
>         
>         Thanks,
>         
>         Carlos
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         netext mailing list
>         netext@ietf.org
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> 
> 