Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09.txt

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D279721F9CB3 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYG-OGjD5Ha7 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9130921F9CA0 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id r5KDjEJN001055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:45:14 +0200
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5KDjEpH016951 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:45:14 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id r5KDj8Qf022010 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:45:14 +0200
Message-ID: <51C30764.1010709@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:45:08 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: netext@ietf.org
References: <20130618165433.13710.84861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130618165433.13710.84861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09.txt
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:45:26 -0000

Hello,

The functionality offered to the Mobile Router, as described in this
draft, is similar if not the same as what the 64share draft does
draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 behaviour called 'IPv6 tethering' and
witnessed on smartphones on cellular operators.

A deployer of Mobile Routers faces thus two alternatives: should use
64share exclusively on the smartphone?  Or should deploy PMIP-PD in the
infrastructure?  It's pointless to do both.

Remark also that 64share v6ops discussion seems to have an oppinion with
respect to DHCPv6-PD (it is the right thing to do), yet no oppinion
about PMIP-PD.

Given these aspects, I am surprised there is no reference from one draft
to the other.

Alex

Le 18/06/2013 18:54, internet-drafts@ietf.org a écrit :
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility
> Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
>
> Title           : Prefix Delegation Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6
> Author(s)       : Xingyue Zhou Jouni Korhonen Carl Williams Sri
> Gundavelli Carlos J. Bernardos Filename        :
> draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09.txt Pages           : 27 Date
> : 2013-06-18
>
> Abstract: This specification defines extensions to Proxy Mobile IPv6
> protocol for allowing a mobile router in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain
> to obtain delegated IP prefixes for its attached mobile networks.
> The mobility entities in the network will provide network-based
> mobility management support for those delegated IP prefixes just as
> how IP mobility support is provided for the mobile node's home
> address. Even as the mobile router performs a handoff and changes its
> network point of attachment, mobility support is ensured for all the
> delegated IP prefixes and for all the IP nodes in the mobile network
> that use IP address configuration from those delegated IP prefixes.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________ netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>
>