Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <denghui02@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CDA21F8B7C for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-pErdCQhlAR for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9CE21F8B74 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg8 with SMTP id 8so1711653wyg.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=43j+fa+HUKr/Js/yXcaGCYyOUayqV8zazmk0kKeVgds=; b=G//rEvg6uLDUxeaLLyPrUMuorP3d0N88oMmBq8D9AmqdVUfbsQyMqxm1HhcM9Ta2TC RlVp8oYu2C1VgpKXCYvmkwGmO+1sNpYY93OtuvWGjVq8IZk9xh/nqLGi9us9HXT5aeEd wUf2d+j6T7gPCPNVonLP5QD9rsi8aeyEopEKQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.19.75 with SMTP id m53mr872296wem.73.1313679543550; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.39.193 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKcc6AeisNcewOeY471RMV1TDkBUzR0mODc0Nm_=s_NNqyfQPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> <CAKcc6AeisNcewOeY471RMV1TDkBUzR0mODc0Nm_=s_NNqyfQPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:59:03 +0800
Message-ID: <CANF0JMBWJD_k046kU6-VxH5zB8V5YTr2e6pQzMokz7qs8doZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
To: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c3dbe8ac36804aac8da61
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:58:11 -0000

Yes  Yes

-Hui

2011/8/18 liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>

> 1. YES
> 2. YES
>
> Best Regards,
> Dapeng Liu
>
> 2011/8/11, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>om>:
>  >
> > At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for
> > Proxy Mobile IPv6" <draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt>
> >
> > General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation
> > is a required feature for PMIP6. We gauged the interest in the room to
> > adopt this I-D as the starting point of a WG I-D for the PD feature
> > and observed the following:
> >
> > "
> > Chairs: how many people think the problem is relevant: 19
> > How many have read it: 7
> > How many think that the proposed solution in the draft can be starting
> > point to work on the problem?
> > In favor: 7 ;  Opposed: 1
> > "
> >
> > We are now following up with the questions on the ML.
> >
> > Question to WG:
> >
> > 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?
> >
> > Yes   [ ]
> > No    [ ]
> >
> > 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
> > draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
> > feature?
> >
> > Yes   [ ]
> > No    [ ]
> >
> > Please respond by August 18th on the ML.
> >
> > -Chairs
> >
> > Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netext mailing list
> > netext@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ------
> Best Regards,
> Dapeng Liu
>  _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>