Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

Yes  Yes

-Hui

2011/8/18 liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>

> 1. YES
> 2. YES
>
> Best Regards,
> Dapeng Liu
>
> 2011/8/11, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>om>:
>  >
> > At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for
> > Proxy Mobile IPv6" <draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt>
> >
> > General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation
> > is a required feature for PMIP6. We gauged the interest in the room to
> > adopt this I-D as the starting point of a WG I-D for the PD feature
> > and observed the following:
> >
> > "
> > Chairs: how many people think the problem is relevant: 19
> > How many have read it: 7
> > How many think that the proposed solution in the draft can be starting
> > point to work on the problem?
> > In favor: 7 ;  Opposed: 1
> > "
> >
> > We are now following up with the questions on the ML.
> >
> > Question to WG:
> >
> > 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?
> >
> > Yes   [ ]
> > No    [ ]
> >
> > 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
> > draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
> > feature?
> >
> > Yes   [ ]
> > No    [ ]
> >
> > Please respond by August 18th on the ML.
> >
> > -Chairs
> >
> > Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netext mailing list
> > netext@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ------
> Best Regards,
> Dapeng Liu
>  _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>