IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 12 February 2014 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AC61A07C6 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:27:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8VWgXyIzgl6 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEF81A0791 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1838; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392164830; x=1393374430; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=SlN0Dx6RtguCaRCkg7emlei1dFiCh4KUt//K5iPCshI=; b=EYr3156r3VQirzsFxGC2SaEQ38ychr7xtyJqK36OdY4hDvVler2Gw0oT FaubJ3ehFvnxmt+JMVuq6LAfiIAfdBN0uqyATgZaU5wE5ClYaEL/futXG 4Hp18NFNZ+q+pa8se29J3UzqYPYv+qudcH0hFsAAnqtu7rl4HJuc4/gvu c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0FAPS++lKtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABagww4V75GT4EWFnSCJQEBAQMBAQEBaxANAQhtCyUCBAESh30IDclyEwSORjqEOASJEI8akiCDLYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,828,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="19713400"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2014 00:27:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1C0R9Nt030609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:27:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.95]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:27:09 -0600
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "cjbc@it.uc3m.es" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob
Thread-Index: AQHPJ4kqQ1vLttxK8UqQtRnY+xGnXQ==
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:27:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CF1FFD0A.1147A2%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1392151601.4016.127.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.89.235]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A6FA255018AC9F4092ACBB4E0178A060@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:27:12 -0000

Hi Carlos,

> BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
>draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we should also close
>that document.

Absolutely. We need to close this work. Here is the document status.

- There were around 6  technical issues that were reported in the issue
tracker
- We have discussed those issues some time back during the meeting and
presented the fixes. The AD (Jari) at that time also was present during
the presentation and agreed with the fixes
- We addresses those comments and updated the draft. Julien had additional
comments and that held the draft for a while
- In the last rev, we addresses Julien's comments (in fact it was his
text) that we adopted

AFAIK, there is no open issue that the Authors are aware off. Raj wanted
to do a detailed review and provide some text/updates. Once we get that
feedback, we can WGLC.

I think we need some good reviews on the draft to ensure the WG is
comfortable with the quality of the document.





Regards
Sri


On 2/11/14 12:46 PM, "Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I'm restarting the discussion about the flow mobility draft. 3GPP is
>considering NB-IFOM again for Rel-13, so I think we should close this
>document as soon as possible.
>
>As discussed during the last meeting, all the issues were cleared. Rajeev
>made some comments on issue #15, brought by Pierrick, on the use of
>update notifications. Rajeev, are you OK with the proposed resolution?
>
>BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
>draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we should also
>close that document.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Carlos
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>netext mailing list
>netext@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email