Re: [netext] Poll: Regarding the flow-mobility WG I-D

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 22 September 2015 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62CD1B2D36 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIMdnt--dSUL for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B161B2D0C for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so210233061wic.0 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jkegX0iHd1cESm2GvaG1pSghycgQiqcezVbJE+QQJDQ=; b=aSaiET2t8D7KtSeYHiG9wxpXB7yxBEHdGp/pA3mqccq1FYQZLBnErW7No51dVesEXc Fzepy0cXO3TGdRjhOlbMPgz2n9OZID3VQLT7zx2Qr/nmOmO/5TCNqoUigqUAvMrPNDoH P6KpFe0AsCILIDx1laRiPvmyzWOvmWJ3FPvOKsg7oR3CnzUDqUefiT31yIJ2GXpGFZ9F OBf2USRX3HkfI/ocRiPEA42FrIuTKLTfO0qAXxtSI4TY02mTipJraD+sgaR5WRVq8Klt HH0V11VYG91zTRXatQdhP5Y0gm5bpRUsRNyagO/0jGzubuskJ9MLnGtnn/8ZGGl8Yhqk Ph9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmAEIlMC/5wYyTEajcqQVbZsmjlVNpglGCimb9uuQalO+TdC5gOfSvltE7GV+N17AKk5oge
X-Received: by 10.180.76.177 with SMTP id l17mr22453224wiw.16.1442952647559; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acorde (82.158.203.25.dyn.user.ono.com. [82.158.203.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pb4sm3589801wjb.8.2015.09.22.13.10.46 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1442952646.2878.24.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>, "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:10:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAA5F1T1d9TOHMBGB=9qLPWibnyoFB4GefGkoMYcWENoZ6GJdFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA5F1T1d9TOHMBGB=9qLPWibnyoFB4GefGkoMYcWENoZ6GJdFA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/Ys_x8r-x5JZCIAnlDdflQ0AIoSg>
Cc: "netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Poll: Regarding the flow-mobility WG I-D
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 20:10:53 -0000

Hi Raj, all,

I've just posted revision -14. I think it is ready for WGLC.

The link to the new version: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft
-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-14.txt

Thanks,

Carlos

On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:11 -0500, Basavaraj Patil wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We would like to do a quick poll on the I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6
> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility <draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6
> -flowmob>
> 
> Current status of this I-D: Expired (as of Aug 29th).
> 
> The flow mobility I-D proposed : "extensions to the Proxy Mobile IPv6
> protocol that are
>    required to support network based flow mobility over multiple
>    physical interfaces"
> 
> Question to the WG: 
> 
> How relevant is this work and this extension to the protocol at this
> phase of the PMIP6 protocols lifecycle? 
> 
> Should we standardize this extension or simply drop it.
> 
> Standardize it [  ]
> Drop it    [  ]
> 
> Your feedback is appreciated. Please respond by 9/11/15. 
> 
> Rgds,
> -Chairs
> 
> 
> -- 
> Basavaraj Patil
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext