Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6 (Rev 4)

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B9A21F8B18 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id StvIDamlHW3c for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA1521F8B0C for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p87Kr8qb016940; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:53:08 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:53:03 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.59) by NOK-AM1MHUB-04.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 22:53:03 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-051.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.86]) by 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.59]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 22:53:02 +0200
From: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
To: <sarikaya@ieee.org>, <draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6 (Rev 4)
Thread-Index: AQHMbNy8PJKafFxS906ekAVZzEsk8ZVCM7UA//+9foA=
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:53:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CA8D4365.104C4%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1315425066.78916.YahooMailNeo@web111416.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.27]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8136FE63EB198C4D9C0E95E4B25FA9A6@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2011 20:53:03.0735 (UTC) FILETIME=[23100870:01CC6DA0]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6 (Rev 4)
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:51:23 -0000

Hi Behcet,

On 9/7/11 2:51 PM, "ext Behcet Sarikaya" <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>11. In sec 4.3 I-D states:
>> "On the LMA-to-AAA interface, the LMA MAY populate the Service-
>>    Selection attribute in the Access-Request message using the service
>>    information found in the received PBU, if such mobility option was
>>    included."
>> 
>> In which I-D or RFC is the service-information option that can be
>> carried within a PBU specified?
>
>
>
>Here, as in RFC 5779, the assumption is that the option defined in RFC
>5149 for BU can also be used in PBU.
>Is this OK?
>


Yes.. Thanks for the clarification. The service-selection mobility option
defined in RFC5149 can be used between the MAG and LMA. It would be good
to clarify in the I-D and add a reference to it as well.

-Raj