[netext] Netext WG will not meet at IETF86

Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bpatil1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91E021F858A for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:16:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZcCIY6VVL7l for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2372921F8586 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id vb8so2617013obc.6 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:16:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=T8XmSCwe0mVNkpgYEuSia9+I+kRHKn0eSRg1KBUWSrs=; b=bft+lpdUPgFTM95hTR67DsS8cASDl87kIgfhVzsK+927+IVaisdWR1MslJGPhUkkOr NuKSwNJA2NWMmOsdMdLMgojYi0vKEpFCFLnQLAeN6zxAFk7IUaY8fhdi+GaPF66ibUam mCmenIXob7KPUCzX+7rbbpq+fUsquzVarDHGpQHlud+CkNFbwKsjWCcbGz6JjYLdXMa0 KFDu4kweKeudoerYc40DWjGIw+LswsJmvRwyOrpaquKC321NTrDQEdZaatDJvklJijYQ dc9Bb5+5yt0bGDuaQ6y+9rfECHYCPlqhle7VWiIeciLvNwypDcfbv7cVCIiAu0uFraPs ny6Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id t3mr4065393obk.56.1358435803719; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:16:43 -0600
Message-ID: <CAA5F1T0tkw_8VbGfGORbgXETihxTDiQq5sr_Fpzd9JFSvJ1g5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
To: netext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04462bbe87e63904d37d7b4e
Cc: netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [netext] Netext WG will not meet at IETF86
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:16:44 -0000

Hello folks,

We have been thinking about the WG status and overall progress.

Overall, we are making good progress on several documents.

However, we think the WG needs to make progress not just at/around meetings.
And we do not believe there are any critical issues that need face-face
meeting at the upcoming IETF(86).
We need people to help review the I-Ds and improve the quality of many of
the documents.

With this in mind, we have decided that we will not meet at Orlando IETF.
Instead, we would like the WG to discuss and resolve any issues over the
email alias. We would also like help with I-D reviews.

We have discussed this with our AD Brian Haberman (Cc'd) and he is fully
supportive of this.