[netext] draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-04 Section 5.1

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 01 October 2012 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57241F0D64 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Irk85Z4tpglj for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF741F040A for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iec9 with SMTP id 9so15327538iec.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iDTfIwTlB3dc+kvU7gPJxA2anGAtXOVDop5MrHndCfQ=; b=HhM/oSwO762UQRQndrYmQqz89EYUqzhejvBVaHhU/7alNlOSeGpD3VKP2sdg8nOPnX /8gMpmKArpkTTDzO4pbfJC0phSIV1UYBaGhJiOiyYQLXHTrGAo1AIgdmS9PrbSoDX/5l g70bZUhJxUe7S3zxCcWFfFdfkejaLVVh15uQvz9yDKUSFWYUe7Wy5NKFfLPcs9eEAJL1 KsBVcaOk327GmkI6mBtB9BASaYTiDoT+ctXYS/ioJWZTrQI9KrkCOYVUaIpV1mLDE+Ll CVZLJSntfWgTilXUgOJ5Hses7KPTwhDds+1SngyqEItMayDL2RYzqtVuz9y37bVzh7J0 qiJw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.5.239 with SMTP id v15mr7094264igv.41.1349127113987; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.55.70 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:31:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcdPSx9=T6gi+raF+wtg-Gkg5TrJLq6mA6rx3nqG=cU1DA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: netext@ietf.org, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [netext] draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-04 Section 5.1
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:31:57 -0000

Hi Carlos,

Section 5.1 is entitled Multiple Care-of Address Registration. In
PMIPv6 there is no care-address so there can not be care-of address
registration, right?

In Figure 7, you have BID. This is adopted from RFC 5648.

Can we really adopt BID in PMIPv6? Please refer to Section 3 in
draft-sarikaya-netext-flowmob-ext-00, unfortunately BID loses its
meaning in PMIPv6.

It seems to me that this section needs to be completely rewritten.

Regards,

Behcet