Re: [netext] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-08: (with COMMENT)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D2B1A1A4E; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:04:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1z8qX9CnBboI; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58461A1A11; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDDE880CE; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.local (unknown [76.21.129.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE34136825A; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:03:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F87E5F.7080107@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:03:43 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150305154630.11284.40854.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150305154630.11284.40854.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Iq0Tsm19ICF5SIiGrc5NFLI69IdxoB1cq"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/ddMuouOOVNGu-Zi_Ehtl26JE1N4>
Cc: netext@ietf.org, netext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:04:12 -0000

Hiya Stephen,

On 3/5/15 10:46 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-ani-location/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> - What if the network being identified here was a tethering
> n/w or any other kind of n/w that's carried about by a person?

That isn't applicable as far as I know.  The location option is used
between the two infrastructure devices (LMA and MAG) providing the proxy
mobility service.  The actual user's location is not being carried and
the MAG is not a mobile platform.

Regards,
Brian