Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F118911E809F for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.626
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.626 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tol5V8wtzAb7 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F1D21F8B88 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh102.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.23]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p7IL2h6v003043; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:03:16 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.6]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:03:05 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.61) by NOK-am1MHUB-02.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:03:04 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-024.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.4.132]) by 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:03:04 +0200
From: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
To: <sgundave@cisco.com>, <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
Thread-Index: AQHMV6VIS+vHAvnEiUyuG4wvA5tZB5UirE6AgAAGvoD///y/AA==
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:03:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CA72E825.1D5E0%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA728881.25763%sgundave@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.28]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <1DD323938F60A34B8F02A898700B0D2D@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2011 21:03:05.0071 (UTC) FILETIME=[39399FF0:01CC5DEA]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:02:26 -0000

Alex,

Does Sri's comment address your question?

-Raj

On 8/18/11 11:14 AM, "ext Sri Gundavelli" <sgundave@cisco.com> wrote:

>Alex:
>
>If I may comment.
>
>
>> Please specify whether this prefix delegation feature is for the goal of
>supporting Network Mobility with PMIP?
>
>#1 Implies, mobility for the delegated prefixes
>
>> Or is it to assign the HNP to the Mobile Host (not necessarily to assign
>MNP for NEMO Mobile Router)?  The two goals are distinctive IMHO.
>
>Assigning HNP to mobile = mobility + delegated prefix (Same as #1)
>
>#2 Assigning MNP to NEMO Mobile Router = RFC3963. NEMO MR per definition
>is
>CMIP enabled.
>
>
>So, the draft is supporting #1.
>
>
>Sri
>
>
>
>
>On 8/18/11 8:50 AM, "Alexandru Petrescu" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hello Raj,
>> 
>> Le 10/08/2011 23:34, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com a écrit :
>>> 
>>> At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for
>>> Proxy Mobile IPv6"<draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt>
>>> 
>>> General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation
>>> is a required feature for PMIP6.
>> 
>> Please specify whether this prefix delegation feature is for the goal of
>> supporting Network Mobility with PMIP?
>> 
>> Or is it to assign the HNP to the Mobile Host (not necessarily to assign
>> MNP for NEMO Mobile Router)?  The two goals are distinctive IMHO.
>> 
>> This to help formulate a problem for prefix delegation for PMIP.
>> 
>> [...]
>>> We are now following up with the questions on the ML.
>>> 
>>> Question to WG:
>>> 
>>> 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6?
>>> 
>>> Yes   [ ]
>>> No    [ ]
>> 
>> Yes, if it is for MNP for Mobile Router.
>> 
>>> 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D:
>>> draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this
>>> feature?
>>> 
>>> Yes   [ ]
>>> No    [ ]
>> 
>> No, unless the problem is clearer.
>> 
>> I hope this helps.
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>>> 
>>> Please respond by August 18th on the ML.
>>> 
>>> -Chairs
>>> 
>>> Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netext mailing list
>>> netext@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>
>_______________________________________________
>netext mailing list
>netext@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext