IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-04

Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com> Wed, 12 October 2011 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rkoodli@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACB921F8B82 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w6TV1i5rX8GS for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDB521F8B7C for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rkoodli@cisco.com; l=1339; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318438655; x=1319648255; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bz0haPO4UrhgFrsGupZg2ZYV0pcbSHZCOMDWQ9LlLig=; b=YK+5VhvLgDH99laxxaJzYNvi8rKJ24hN8EpCJdzPmWHciC6yI4rDXmRA YSz80V8DG2pbZ4TNHY4aULWYxrEUp9JTAMW7s04XzajcuUcgBLBWvKdkH hp5o1z5wRQf+M3hIex7ITaiqp4762VoRSeiC+0pWsc8JL5Unj3S6KCH2c M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAM/GlU6tJXG8/2dsb2JhbABDqDSBBYFTAQEBAQIBAQEBDwEnAgExCxIBCBhVMAEBBAENBSKHXAibXQGeYwOHWASHf4t2hTGMQw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,335,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="27906569"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2011 16:57:34 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9CGvVfC014383; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:57:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-111.cisco.com ([72.163.62.153]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:57:33 -0500
Received: from 10.21.84.116 ([10.21.84.116]) by XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com ([72.163.62.153]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:57:33 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:11:03 -0700
From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
To: "Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com
Message-ID: <CABB1837.14DBB%rkoodli@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-04
Thread-Index: AcxGcYt8Segd5A1bSEOc4ChY6g6NHQtVxdiABT6klwAAD62hpg==
In-Reply-To: <CABB2D64.1209E%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2011 16:57:33.0337 (UTC) FILETIME=[0925A890:01CC8900]
Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr@tools.ietf.org, netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-04
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:57:36 -0000

Hi Suresh,

The PFMIPv6 spec had to address a similar issue - tunnel between MAGs.
Perhaps you can embellish the relevant text from there.

Thanks.

-Rajeev



On 10/12/11 9:42 AM, "Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
wrote:

> 
> Suresh/I-D authors,
> 
> Is there a resolution to this issue? Can you please propose text that the
> WG can agree on and we will then move forward.
> 
> -Raj
> 
> On 9/15/11 1:58 PM, "ext Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> 11.
>>>>   The tunnel between the MAGs is assumed to be established by means
>>>>   outside the scope of this document.
>>>  
>>> It would be useful to at least provide some examples of the tunnel
>>> establishment between MAGs from a completeness perspective. It looks
>>> like handwaving at the moment.
>> 
>> I agree with you that it is handwavy, but I am not sure what to add
>> here. People wanted all kinds of tunnels here, IPv6, IPv4, GRE, USP,
>> IPsec etc. with either manual or dynamic creation. If you want a
>> specific scenario, I could add it here but if I remember correctly we
>> did not even manage to get consensus among the authors.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email