Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications

Hi Raj,

My answer to the question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D: draft
-krishnan-netext-update-notifications as a working group document?:

Yes:  [ X ]

3GPP needs this spec, so I do support this I-D and expect it to be
published as soon as possible.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2012/11/13 12:11), Basavaraj Patil wrote:
> 
> The I-D : Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6 
> <draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications> was presented at the WG 
> meeting at IETF85 (Atlanta).
> There was consensus in the room to adopt this I-D as a WG document (11 
> in favor of, None against).
> 
> Please treat this as a consensus call for adopting this I-D as a WG 
> document.
> 
> Question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D: 
> draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications as a working group document?
> 
> Yes:  [  ]
> No :  [  ]
> 
> Some background info: The 3GPP liaison to the IETF has indicated the 
> relevance of this I-D to their specifications and is awaiting feedback 
> from the AD and the chairs about its status.
> 
> Abstract
> 
>     Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network based mobility management
>     protocol that enables IP mobility for a host without requiring its
>     participation in any mobility-related signaling.  This document
>     proposes a mechanism for the Local Mobility Anchor to asynchronously
>     notify the Mobile Access Gateway about changes related to the
>     mobility session.
> 
> This consensus call will expire on November 26th, 2012.
> 
> -Chairs
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> 