Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications

Carl Williams <carlw@mcsr-labs.org> Tue, 13 November 2012 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <carlw@mcsr-labs.org>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE3221F8705 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:16:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8en7AehjrOR for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail149c38.carrierzone.com (mail149c38.carrierzone.com [66.175.56.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3546E21F871A for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:16:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Authenticated-User: carlw.mcsr-labs.org
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (c-76-26-116-46.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.26.116.46]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail149c38.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qADGG2LB006191; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:16:04 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:15:52 -0500
From: Carl Williams <carlw@mcsr-labs.org>
To: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>, netext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CCC7DC55.304EE%carlw@mcsr-labs.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications
In-Reply-To: <CAA5F1T3S1wAoPW4EJMeXgfKVuzE1XFhzv02LQpzKS2b4PCHKZw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3435650166_7431422"
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=o7lO6kWEL4L/PfaWQrxviZZmv9cSEjongez8MLKgMfw= c=1 sm=1 a=W-hxRJO8TvsA:10 a=WMVmSKuc5oYA:10 a=Gzqcop6RMF0A:10 a=WiTtp9uikyOPz/qaqt8fsw==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=B4hgXcfuPX9-s-Ri1rMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=d-MJUgN9tsJt5Nfdj5UA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=q8iK_gzt6WEr_S65:21 a=WiTtp9uikyOPz/qaqt8fsw==:117
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010201.50A27246.0051, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
Cc: draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:16:13 -0000

My answer to the question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D:
draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications as a working group document?:



Yes:  [ X ]

From:  Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
Date:  Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:11:36 -0600
To:  <netext@ietf.org>
Cc:  <draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications@tools.ietf.org>
Subject:  [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D
draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications


The I-D : Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6
<draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications> was presented at the WG meeting
at IETF85 (Atlanta).
There was consensus in the room to adopt this I-D as a WG document (11 in
favor of, None against).

Please treat this as a consensus call for adopting this I-D as a WG
document.

Question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D:
draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications as a working group document?

Yes:  [  ]
No :  [  ]

Some background info: The 3GPP liaison to the IETF has indicated the
relevance of this I-D to their specifications and is awaiting feedback from
the AD and the chairs about its status.

Abstract

   Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network based mobility management
   protocol that enables IP mobility for a host without requiring its
   participation in any mobility-related signaling.  This document
   proposes a mechanism for the Local Mobility Anchor to asynchronously
   notify the Mobile Access Gateway about changes related to the
   mobility session.

This consensus call will expire on November 26th, 2012.

-Chairs

_______________________________________________ netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext