Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 14:50 UTC
Return-Path: <denghui02@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEC321F8B98 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rwa6DNcYejNi for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BD321F8B92 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg8 with SMTP id 8so1705488wyg.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5HuCWyj7SnYrOtgmBdqRYny0ku4o5JH5o7y/72hA214=; b=BLJmkX1l9mwGN9P/EWJf0rehn+5M1uiL89fkjKlVFm+w/3DCvOAI5qpyX+MEYjHGY+ hGS189b0+bnhdaqGRNHSFg6js78JmZ1CHM1GU8k173c7MmhaqiPnrvv5Uyoivk8V3dWO zdItt/4AvUKXJv2dzQFY1vbLC4M2eBBybzBS4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.19.75 with SMTP id m53mr864796wem.73.1313679096148; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.39.193 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA686B71.1CF5F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
References: <AQHMV6n4iQzLbboj+0iLXz1Fln8x0w==> <CA686B71.1CF5F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:51:35 +0800
Message-ID: <CANF0JMCs4=UDwBoSOhcE9rVz4wwNcWNQ41MSCJm1JypVBD4jSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e64c3dbedff56e04aac8bfd2"
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:50:46 -0000
Yes Yes -Hui 2011/8/11 <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> > > The proposal: "Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6" > <draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt> Was discussed > at the IETF81 Netext WG meeting. > > Rough consensus from polling the WG members in the room indicated: > " > 5 have read the draft > 4 think it is a relevant problem and we have to solve it > 2 think it is no clear reason to carry more than ATT > " > > This email is a follow up on the WG ML before we make a decision. So > please respond to the following questions: > > Q1: Do you agree with the problem, solution and benefit of the ANI > option as described in I-D: > draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt? > > Yes [ ] > No [ ] > > Q2: Do you support adoption of the I-D > draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt as the starting > point for working on this feature in the WG? > > Yes [ ] > No [ ] > > > Please respond by August 18th to the above questions on the ML. > > -Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >
- [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Network I… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Jouni
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Mark Grayson (mgrayson)
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Carl Williams
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Jinho Kim
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… xiayangsong
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Mohana Jeyatharan
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Netwo… Hui Deng