Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 14:27 UTC
Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B821F87C6 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vr3Fw6tWA34Q for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686CA21F87B2 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (in-mx.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q6DERkl0018709; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:27:46 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.23]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:28:12 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-071.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.164]) by 008-AM1MMR1-007.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.23]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.004; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:27:44 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
Thread-Topic: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
Thread-Index: AQHNYNk4gAMYTdsgxkWSuCD0y/Yk0JcmqX0AgABZ0oD//8z8gA==
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:27:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CC259A74.21090%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <500014DD.2060107@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420
x-originating-ip: [172.19.40.29]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <AE049C85DF43CC4995434EB989128B7D@mgd.nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2012 14:28:12.0819 (UTC) FILETIME=[BBDC5E30:01CD6103]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:27:20 -0000
On 7/13/12 7:30 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: > >> DHCP is an independent protocol and hence has no implications >> regarding network based mobility teams design of not modifying the >> MN. > >Yes but: adding DHCPv6 on a MN is considered as modification or not. Not in the context of PMIP6. -Raj > >Alex
- [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossib… Basavaraj.Patil